Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 42258632

Pancreatic fat and the risk of future dysglycemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jie Yang·Xuan Zhang·Lihong Luo·Zhenjiang Zheng·Chunlu Tan·Xubao Liu·Yonghua Chen
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

CONTEXT: Pancreatic fat has emerged as a metabolically relevant ectopic fat depot, but its longitudinal association with future dysglycemic outcomes remains incompletely defined. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the longitudinal association of pancreatic fat with incident type 2 diabetes (T2D) and glycemic progression, with exploratory narrative synthesis of evidence in lean populations. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to March 1, 2026. STUDY SELECTION: Longitudinal observational studies assessing pancreatic fat at baseline and reporting subsequent incident T2D, glycemic progression, or both were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. DATA SYNTHESIS: Ten studies were included. In the primary binary meta-analysis (5 studies), higher pancreatic fat burden was associated with incident T2D (pooled effect estimate, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.27-5.14; I2 = 93.3%). Exclusion of 1 influential ultrasound-based study attenuated heterogeneity while preserving the association (pooled effect estimate, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.23-1.73; I2 = 10.2%). A separate continuous analysis (3 studies) also supported an association with incident T2D (1.17; 95% CI, 1.04-1.32; I2 = 79.2%), although exposure scales were not directly comparable. Pancreatic fat was also associated with glycemic progression (2 studies; 1.96; 95% CI, 1.10-3.48; I2 = 73.2%). Exploratory lean-population evidence was limited to 2 analytical contexts, synthesized narratively, and directionally consistent with the overall findings. CONCLUSION: Pancreatic fat was associated with adverse future glycemic outcomes across multiple analytical contexts. These findings support pancreatic fat as a potentially meaningful imaging-derived marker of future dysglycemia, while suggesting that heterogeneity is partly explained by differences in exposure ascertainment.

Explore related subjects

HumansDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2PancreasAdipose TissueRisk Factorsfatty pancreasglycemic progressionmeta-analysispancreatic fatsystematic reviewtype 2 diabetesJournal ArticleSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jie Yang, Xuan Zhang, Lihong Luo, Zhenjiang Zheng, Chunlu Tan, Xubao Liu, Yonghua Chen. 2026-09-16. Pancreatic fat and the risk of future dysglycemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgag222

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 subjectHumans subjectJournal Article subjectJournal Article; Systematic Review; Meta-Analysis resourceMeta-Analysis subjectSystematic reviews study

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Glycemic and safety outcomes of the insulin-only bionic pancreas in older adults and individuals with impaired awareness of Hypoglycemia: a post hoc analysis of a randomized pivotal trial.

AIMS: Evaluate the efficacy and safety of iLet Bionic Pancreas (BP) in older adults and individuals with impaired awareness of hypoglycemia (IAH). METHODS: This post hoc analysis used individual participant-level data from the Insulin-Only Bionic Pancreas Pivotal Trial (n = 440; NCT04200313). Eligible participants (n = 96) with type 1 diabetes, aged ≥ 60 years and/or had IAH (Clarke score ≥ 4), were randomized to BP with aspart/lispro (BP-Asp/Lis; n = 45), BP with fast-acting aspart configuration (BP-Fiasp; n = 31), or standard care (SC; n = 20) for 13 weeks. RESULTS: Compared with SC, time-in-range (70-180 mg/dL) significantly increased by 7.49 % (95 % CI: 2.61 to 12.38; ∼1.8 h/day) with BP-Asp/Lis and by 8.28 % (95 % CI: 3.15 to 13.41; ∼2.0 h/day) with BP-Fiasp, driven by reduced hyperglycemia. No significant differences were observed in hypoglycemia exposure. Severe hypoglycemia occurred in four participants (four events) on BP-Asp/Lis and one participant (two events) on SC. One diabetic ketoacidosis event occurred on BP-Fiasp due to an infusion set failure. CONCLUSIONS: In high-risk, clinically vulnerable populations, the BP system significantly improved glycemic control while maintaining safety parity with respect to hypoglycemia risk, providing a resilient therapeutic alternative for vulnerable cohorts.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Relationship Between Number of Acute Pancreatitis Episodes and Risk of New-onset Diabetes in the U.S.: A Real-world Data Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common inflammatory disorder that is associated with increased risk for diabetes mellitus (DM). It remains unclear whether recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP) is associated with further increased risk of incident DM. This study aims to investigate the association between RAP and incident DM using real-world data. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the MerativeTM MarketScan&#xae; claims database (2016-2023), identifying patients with AP and no prior history of DM at baseline. The primary exposure of interest, RAP, was defined as one or more episodes of AP occurring &#x2265;90 days after the index AP diagnosis, whereas one episode of AP referred to a single episode of AP (SAP) with no subsequent recurrence within 90 days following the index event. A multivariable stratified Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to determine the association between RAP and incident DM, identified using ICD-10 codes. RESULTS: In total, 16,184 individuals with AP (mean [SD] age: 45.8 [12.3]) contributed 40,712 person-years of follow-up, during which 1,477 incident cases of DM were documented. Individuals with RAP had an increased risk of incident DM compared with those with a SAP(adjusted HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.61-2.29). The risk increased significantly with the frequency of RAP. In comparing the modifying effect of patient demographics and comorbidities, a stronger association between RAP and incident DM was observed in females (adjusted HR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.87-3.19) than in males (adjusted HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.30-2.07; Pinteraction=0.03). Also, stronger associations were observed among younger patients (18-46&#xa0;y) (adjusted HR=2.56; 95% CI, 1.97-3.31) and among non-tobacco abuse (adjusted HR=2.19; 95% CI, 1.81-2.65), with significant interactions for all comparisons (Pinteraction<0.05. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world study, RAP was associated with an increased risk of incident DM. Our findings highlight an opportunity for glycemic monitoring and proactive management of patients with RAP to mitigate their risk of developing DM.

AP↗
PubMed2026

Optimal dose and exercise modality to improve HbA1c in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review with pairwise, network, and dose-response meta-analyses.

We aimed to compare exercise modalities and evaluate dose-response relationships with glycemic control including continuous aerobic exercise (CAE), resistance training (RT), combined exercise (CE), mind-body exercise (MBE), and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Three databases were searched for randomized controlled trials of exercise interventions in older adults with T2DM reporting glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Pairwise, Bayesian network, and dose-response meta-analyses were conducted. Compared with control, HIIT demonstrated the largest estimated reduction (MD&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.95%; 95% CrI&#xa0;-1.45, -0.49), followed by CE (MD&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.59%; 95% CrI&#xa0;-0.93, -0.25), CAE (MD&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.46%; 95% CrI&#xa0;-0.69, -0.24), MBE (MD&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.42%; 95% CrI&#xa0;-0.76, -0.10), and RT (MD&#xa0;=&#xa0;-0.29%; 95% CrI&#xa0;-0.51, -0.08). Dose-response network meta-analyses suggested a non-linear association between overall exercise dose and HbA1c reduction, with maximal estimated benefits at approximately 704 METs-min/week with the 95% CrI excluding zero between 241 and 920 METs-min/week. HIIT demonstrated the steepest estimated dose-response relationship, but with wider credible intervals. Other exercise modalities showed more gradual dose-response patterns across their estimated effective ranges. Our findings suggest that exercise prescription for older adults with T2DM should be individualized according to exercise modality, dose, and health status.

Humans↗