Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 42106004

The global prevalence of horizontal strabismus: A systematic review and meta-analysis with a focus on ethnic variation.

Abstract

The prevalence of the 2 types of horizontal strabismus, esotropia and exotropia, varies considerably between studies. This variability has been attributed to factors such as geography/environment, research methodology, age of study subjects, and/or ethnicity. Comprehensive estimates of regional and global prevalences of esotropia and exotropia are lacking, making it difficult to recognize true patterns, trends, and etiologies. We compile prevalences and ratios of esotropia to exotropia from 315 population-based studies and 374 clinic-based studies. We analyze data to assess effects of ethnicity, geography, age, and we identify generational changes of horizontal strabismus. Major ethnicities differ in patterns and ratios of esotropia and exotropia prevalence, not only in Caucasians and East Asians, but also Latinos/Hispanics, South Asians, Africans, and Native Americans. Compared to population-based studies, clinic-based studies underestimate exotropia frequency. By weighing prevalences according to the population size of ethnicities, we estimate the worldwide prevalence of horizontal strabismus in the current generation at 1.81% (138.5 million people), comprising 60.0 million people with esotropia (0.67%) and 87.5 million with exotropia (1.14%). In the previous generation, the worldwide prevalence of horizontal strabismus was 1.64% (86.5 million people), comprising 50.5 million with esotropia (0.96%) and 36.0 million with exotropia (0.68%). Esotropia and exotropia prevalences differ between generations within the same ethnicity, indicating that extrinsic factors can modify the underlying intrinsic (genetic) disposition.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Christopher S von Bartheld, Molly M Hagen, Jiayi Jiang, Wei Yang, Andrea B Agarwal. 2026-05-07. The global prevalence of horizontal strabismus: A systematic review and meta-analysis with a focus on ethnic variation.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2026.05.002

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Regional and statewide hysterectomy-corrected endometrial cancer incidence and five-year relative survival in Texas.

BACKGROUND: Rising endometrial cancer (EC) incidence nationwide, particularly among Hispanic women, and high prevalence of risk factors such as obesity and comorbidities in Texas, motivated us to estimate EC incidence rates (IRs) and survival by age (<50 years/ early-onset, &#x2265;50 years/late-onset), race-ethnicity (Non-Hispanic-White [NHW], -Black [NHB], Hispanic), histology (endometrioid, non-endometrioid), and area-based socioeconomic (SES) factors across Texas Health Service Regions (HSRs). STUDY DESIGN: Between 2000 and 2019, a total of 42,571 women (20-79 years) with EC were reported from Texas within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. IRs and 5-year relative survival were calculated using SEER*Stat. IRs were corrected for hysterectomy using Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data. RESULTS: Statewide EC IRs rose from 38.5 (2000-2009) to 44.5 (2010-2019), with the highest increase in the Upper-South (42.6 to 53.8). Across HSRs, Upper-South consistently had higher IRs among women <&#x202f;50 (13.9) and &#x2265;&#x202f;50 years (112.7). Among those <&#x202f;50 years, Hispanics had the highest IRs (12.4), predominantly endometrioid tumors, whereas in women &#x2265;&#x202f;50 years, NHB had the highest IRs (119.2) with a large proportion of non-endometrioid tumors. IRs were higher in areas with lower poverty, and higher education, income, and urbanization. Associations with unemployment were mixed. Worse survival outcomes were observed among NHBs, non-endometrioid, advanced-stage, and lower SES. Central Texas had more favorable survival outcomes compared to other HSR. CONCLUSION: EC IRs and survival rates in Texas largely mirror national trends, with regional differences likely reflecting sociodemographic and histologic distributions.

Humans

Assessment of Methodological Bias in Studies Reporting Racial Differences in Retinopathy of Prematurity in the United States.

PURPOSE: To assess methodological biases in studies reporting racial and ethnic differences in retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). METHODS: Systematic review of peer-reviewed studies published between 2014 and 2024 that reported on ROP outcome measures by race, ethnicity, or social determinants of health (SDOH). Three reviewers independently assessed each observation for selection and collider bias using definitions derived from perinatal epidemiology literature. Findings were also compared using a structured comparative synthesis between studies with and without identified methodological bias. RESULTS: A structured PubMed search identified 78 articles; 13&#x2009;met inclusion criteria, with one study contributing two distinct analytical approaches, yielding 14 total observations. Survivorship bias was identified in 6 of 14 observations (42.9%), primarily due to the exclusion of infants who died prior to ROP screening. Potential collider bias was most common, found in 9 of 14 observations (64.3%), and was introduced through adjustment or stratification by gestational age and/or birthweight. Three studies did not exhibit either assessed biases. Among studies with identified bias, 8 of 10 observations reported lower ROP risk among Black versus White infants, whereas 3 of 4 observations without identified bias reported higher ROP risk or incidence among Black infants. CONCLUSION: Methodological biases in ROP studies investigating race or ethnicity are prevalent. Adjustment for gestational age or birthweight may introduce spurious race-ROP associations and contribute to paradoxical findings. Further exploration of the impact of SDOH on disease outcomes may reduce the misattribution of race as a biological risk factor and improve the interpretation of ROP disparities.

Collider bias

Uric Acid-to-HDL Cholesterol Ratio is Associated with Hepatic Steatosis but Not Fibrosis in Nonobese Adults: A NHANES 2017-2020 Study.

BACKGROUND: Although metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) has traditionally been regarded as a disease closely related to obesity, its prevalence is gradually rising in nonobese populations. The uric acid-to-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (UHR) is a novel metabolic biomarker that has been shown to be associated with MASLD. However, its role in nonobese individuals remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the association between UHR and nonobese MASLD. METHODS: Data from the 2017 to 2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) were analyzed. UHR was calculated as the serum uric acid (UA) divided by the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL). Liver steatosis (using controlled attenuation parameters, CAP) and fibrosis (using liver stiffness measurement, LSM) were evaluated through vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE). Multivariate linear regression was employed to evaluate associations. Nonlinear relationships were examined using smoothed curve fitting. RESULTS: This analysis included 3573 participants (47.41% male; aged 20-80 years). Log2-UHR was positively associated with CAP (&#x3b2; = 9.96, 95% CI: 6.93-12.98, P < 0.001) and MASLD prevalence (OR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.38-1.95, P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed significant interactions by sex, age, ethnicity, and smoking status (all P for interaction < 0.05), with stronger associations in females, adults aged 40-59 years, individuals of other Hispanic ethnicity, and never-smokers. Moreover, the association between log2-UHR and CAP was linear and positive (P < 0.01). No significant association was found between log2-UHR and LSM (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: UHR is independently associated with hepatic steatosis but not fibrosis in nonobese US adults, suggesting its potential utility as an early risk assessment to tool. Large scale prospective studies are needed in the future to further validate the conclusions of this study.

Humans