A Multi-omics Exploration Revealing SLIT2 as a Prime Therapeutic Target for Peripheral Facial Paralysis: Integrating Single-Cell Transcriptomics and Plasma Proteome Data.

Abstract

Peripheral facial paralysis (PFP) is a common neurological disorder characterized by facial-nerve dysfunction. Identifying therapeutic targets and understanding the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying PFP are crucial for developing effective treatment strategies. This study combined Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) to explore potential therapeutic candidates and their roles in PFP pathophysiology. The MR analysis included 1925 publicly available plasma protein cis-heritability instruments. Instrumental variables were selected for MR analysis to identify plasma proteins associated with PFP, followed by colocalization analysis to evaluate shared genetic variants between the identified proteins and PFP. After the initial identification of plasma proteins associated with Bell's palsy using MR analysis, a rat model of facial-nerve injury was established to further dissect underlying mechanisms at cellular and molecular levels. Using scRNA-seq technology, we delved deeply into cellular Heterogeneity and dynamic changes in gene expression in the facial-nerve nucleus tissues under both injured and control conditions, thereby achieving a systematic study ranging from macroscopic genetic associations to microscopic cellular functions. Finally, expression patterns were preliminarily validated by performing in vitro immunofluorescence analysis on the facial-nerve nucleus samples of SD rats. The MR analysis results identified 30 plasma proteins significantly associated with PFP, with nine target genes showing differential expression in the scRNA-seq data. Colocalization analysis demonstrated that slit guidance Ligand 2 (SLIT2), semaphorin 4D (SEMA4D), EGF containing fibulin extracellular matrix protein 1 (EFEMP1), and sprouty related EVH1 domain containing 2 (SPRED2) shared causal variants with PFP. SLIT2 was highly expressed in the microglia and inhibitory neurons in the experimental group, whereas SEMA4D showed elevated expression across multiple glial cell types in the same group. In contrast, EFEMP1 and SPRED2 showed distinct expression patterns in fibroblasts and oligodendrocytes. The role of SLIT2 has been previously well-documented in many central nervous system diseases. However, for the first time, this study detected SLIT2 alteration after facial-nerve injury. Altered intercellular signaling, particularly enhanced SLIT2-ROBO signaling between neurons and glial cells, was observed in the PFP group. Pseudotime analysis revealed dynamic SLIT2 expression during microglia and inhibitory neuron differentiation, mirroring changes in ROBO1 expression. Immunofluorescence analysis of rat facial-nerve nucleus samples verified that SLIT2 protein levels were significantly increased in the facial-nerve nuclei of injured samples. In conclusion, despite the fact that this study is primarily founded on animal models and despite notable differences existing between animals and humans in terms of the facial motor nucleus, this study successfully identified SLIT2 as potential therapeutic targets for PFP. The SLIT2-ROBO axis stands out as a particularly promising candidate. SLIT2 may play a role in modulating neuroimmune interactions and promoting nerve repair. These findings provide a foundation for future clinical studies and targeted interventions to enhance recovery from PFP. Future research should focus on human sample validation to enhance clinical translation.