Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 41040380

Multiple Epigenetic Mechanisms Functionally Cooperate to Silence Expression of Somatostatin Receptor Type 2 in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Abstract

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are a rare and understudied set of cancers, with increasing incidence. Neuroendocrine tumors are unique in the fact that they express high levels of the somatostatin receptor type 2 (SSTR2), which represents a target for both tumor imaging and therapeutics. PNET grade inversely correlates with SSTR2 tumor staining and higher tumor grade is associated with poor patient prognosis. With no known mutations, SSTR2 expression is believed to be lost through aberrant epigenetic mechanisms. Enhanced knowledge of the epigenetic biology and players controlling SSTR2 expression may allow for identification of novel PNET imaging and treatment modalities. Through in-depth studies, we found that the specific de novo DNA methyltransferase (DNMT), DNMT3B, is responsible for SSTR2 gene CpG methylation and silencing. Using DNMT3B as a starting point, along with the concept of functional crosstalk between various epigenetic mechanisms, we further discovered that Polycomb Repressor Complexes 1 and 2 (PRC1 and PRC2) play important roles in silencing SSTR2. Moreover, we found several histone lysine demethylases, enzymes that remove activating histone H3K4 methylation marks, to be critical for silencing expression of SSTR2. We additionally identified several chromatin remodeling enzymes/complexes as cellular factors that negatively regulate SSTR2 expression. Finally, using the HiBiT luminescent reporter system, we exploited functional chemo-genomic screens to further expand our knowledge of SSTR2 epigenetic control. These screens both reinforced several of our initial findings and helped to identify additional silencing mechanism potentially regulating SSTR2 expression. A commonality in our findings point to the presence, or necessity, of Class I HDACs in nearly all the epigenetic silencing mechanisms characterized. Overall, our work demonstrates that SSTR2 gene expression is likely silenced through various dynamic and interconnected epigenetic events, resulting in a compacted, transcriptionally repressed chromatin environment. Our study offers novel potential therapeutic targets and combinations to best increase expression of SSTR2, which are currently being tested in pre-clinical studies from our group, with the goal of future clinical trials aimed at increasing SSTR2 expression in high-grade, SSTR2-low NET patients.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

James P Madigan, Stephen G Andrews, Rivka B Farrell, Steven D Forsythe, Rupali Sharma, Michele Ceribelli, Craig J Thomas, Kimia N Shamsian, Shinjen Lin, Ken Chih-Chien Cheng, Samira M Sadowski. 2025-09-25. Multiple Epigenetic Mechanisms Functionally Cooperate to Silence Expression of Somatostatin Receptor Type 2 in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.23.677935

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article