Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 41001506

Germline Variants Influence Chronic Liver Disease Progression through Distinct Pathways.

Abstract

Cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are long-term complications of chronic liver disease (CLD). In this large multi-ancestry genome-wide association study of all-cause cirrhosis (35,481 cases, 2.36M controls) and HCC (6,680 cases, 1.76M controls), we identified 27 loci associated with cirrhosis (10 novel) and 11 with HCC (three novel). Three novel cirrhosis loci were replicated in independent cohorts (e.g. FGF21, RPTOR, and IFNL3/4). Fifteen cirrhosis loci exhibited differential effects on cirrhosis risk via underlying etiologies, and six HCC loci influenced HCC risk indirectly via cirrhosis. In a gene-burden analysis of rare variants from whole-genome sequencing data in the VA Million Veteran Program (n=102,677), we identified GSTA5 as a novel cirrhosis-associated gene, while APOB and ATP9B were associated with and replicated for HCC. A high genetic risk score for cirrhosis was associated with a nearly doubled risk of CLD progressing to cirrhosis (HR=1.94, P=2×10-68) and of cirrhosis progressing to HCC (HR=1.65, P=7×10-08). Finally, among individuals with chronic hepatitis C who underwent antiviral therapy, cirrhosis risk was modified by variants in PNPLA3, IFNL3/4, and CD81 following pegylated interferon-α therapy, and by APOE lead variant following direct-acting antiviral therapy. These findings provide new insights into the complex genetic architecture of CLD progression with potential clinical and therapeutic implications.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Marijana Vujkovic, David E Kaplan, Jonas Ghouse, Bao-Li Loza, Joseph Brancale, Adam Lewis, David Y Zhang, Michael G Levin, Olivia J Veatch, Josephine P Johnson, Carolin V Schneider, Anurag Verma, Kirk J Wangensteen, Eleonora Scorletti, Dipender Gill, Chigoziri Konkwo, Alexis M Garófalo, Lindsay A Guare, Tae-Wi Schwantes-An, Marco V Abreu, Helene Gellert-Kristensen, Ole B Pedersen, Christian Erikstrup, Johan S Bundgaard, Erik Sørensen, Sisse R Ostrowski, Henning Bundgaard, Kyung Min Lee, Abraham Shaked, Kim M Olthoff, Maarouf A Hoteit, Elizabeth K Speliotes, Yanhua Chen, Antonino Oliveri, Lishi Yin, Luca Vc Valenti, Francesco Malvestiti, Daniele Marchelli, Lorenzo Miano, Quentin M Anstee, Ann K Daly, Heather J Cordell, Rebecca Darlay, Niek Verweij, George Hindy, Adam Locke, Kentaro Matsuura, Sumeet K Asrani, Giuliano Testa, Luca A Lotta, Marcus B Jones, Daniel R Dochtermann, Trina M Norden-Krichmar, Craig C Teerlink, Poornima Devineni, Saiju Pyarajan, Daniel J Rader, Yasuhito Tanaka, Benjamin F Voight, Silvia Vilarinho, Lisa A Bastarache, Stefan Stender, Philip S Tsao, Penn Medicine Biobank, DBDS Genomic Consortium, BioVU Biobank, Michigan Genomics Initiative, Regeneron Genetics Center, Indiana Biobank, All Of Us Research Program, Milano Biobank, LITMUS Consortium, VA Million Veteran Program, Timothy R Morgan, Julie A Lynch, Kyong-Mi Chang. 2025-09-18. Germline Variants Influence Chronic Liver Disease Progression through Distinct Pathways.. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.16.25335186

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article