Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 40964041

Scalable single-cell total RNA-seq reveals non-coding programs in immunity, infection, and brain development.

Abstract

Non-coding RNAs represent a widespread and diverse layer of post-transcriptional regulation across cell types and states, yet much of their diversity remains uncharted at single-cell resolution. This gap stems from the limitations of widely used single-cell RNA-sequencing protocols, which focus on polyadenylated transcripts and miss many short or non-polyadenylated RNAs. Here, we adapted single-cell RNA-sequencing on the 10x Genomics platform to capture a broad complement of coding and non-coding RNAs-including miRNAs, tRNAs, lncRNAs, histone RNAs, and non-adenylated viral transcripts. This approach enabled the discovery of rich, dynamic non-coding RNA programs across immune cells, virally infected hepatocytes, and the developing human brain. In dengue virus-infected hepatocytes, we detect non-adenylated viral transcripts and distinguish active from transcriptionally quiescent infected states, each with distinct host regulatory signatures. In brain tissue, we identify biotype-specific, cell-type-restricted non-coding RNAs, including miRNAs whose expression anticorrelates with predicted targets, consistent with post-transcriptional regulatory relationships. We show that MIR137, one of the strongest GWAS loci associated with schizophrenia and intellectual disability, is expressed specifically in Cajal-Retzius cells, an early-born but transient population that guides subsequent cortical neuron migration. These findings demonstrate the importance of non-coding RNAs in defining cell identity and state, and show how expanded transcriptome coverage can reveal additional layers of gene control-now accessible through practical and scalable single-cell profiling.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alina Isakova, Stephen Quake, Daniel Liu, Ivana Cvijovic, Rahul Sinha, Anna Eastman, Sirle Saul, Angela Detweiler, Norma Neff, Shirit Einav, Irving Weissman. 2025-09-08. Scalable single-cell total RNA-seq reveals non-coding programs in immunity, infection, and brain development.. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7294776%2Fv1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article