Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 40951274

A common DNA deletion altering the 3'UTR of mdr1 is associated with reduced mefloquine susceptibility in P. vivax parasites from Cambodian patients.

Abstract

Artemisinin-combination therapies (ACTs) are now recommended for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria caused by Plasmodium vivax, the parasite responsible for the majority of malaria infections outside of Africa. We analyzed the genome sequences of 206 P. vivax parasites collected from Cambodian malaria patients and showed that more than 80% of them carried a DNA deletion located immediately downstream of the multidrug resistance 1 gene (mdr1). This 837 bp deletion overlapped with a different deletion present at low frequency in South American isolates, suggesting a functional role despite not altering the coding sequence of mdr1. Using RNA sequencing, we showed that these deletions altered the transcripts expressed from mdr1 and resulted in mRNAs with different 3' untranslated regions. In Cambodian isolates, the deletion was significantly associated with a higher expression of mdr1 and a lower ex vivo susceptibility to mefloquine. Finally, we genotyped 592 Cambodian isolates collected between 2014 and 2024 and showed that the mdr1 deletion increased in frequency in Cambodia since the introduction of mefloquine as ACT partner drug. Overall, these findings indicate that a common deletion of a non-coding sequence affects the transcription, stability, or translation of mdr1 in P. vivax parasites and could mediate reduced susceptibility to antimalarial drug(s) currently used for the treatment of uncomplicated vivax malaria.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Katie Ko, Kieran Tebben, Tsarasoa Andrianinarivomanana, Agnes Orban, Janne Grünebast, Virak Eng, Rotha Eam, Nimol Khim, Lionel Feufack-Donfack, Jeremy Salvador, Juliana Sá, Thomas Wellems, Dysoley Lek, Jean Popovici, David Serre. 2025-09-01. A common DNA deletion altering the 3'UTR of mdr1 is associated with reduced mefloquine susceptibility in P. vivax parasites from Cambodian patients.. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6889263%2Fv1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article