Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 40950476

Enhancer-targeting CRISPR screens at coronary artery disease loci suggest shared mechanisms of disease risk.

Abstract

To systematically identify causal genetic mechanisms that confer risk for coronary artery disease (CAD) in GWAS loci, we mapped genome-wide variant-to-enhancer-to-gene (V2E2G) links in vascular smooth muscle cells (SMC). Enhancers identified by active chromatin features, and further prioritized by base-resolution deep learning models of chromatin accessibility in 108 CAD loci, were studied with CRISPRi targeting and Direct-Capture Targeted Perturb-seq (DC-TAP-seq) evaluation of 470 genes. Seventy-six V2E2G links were identified for 59 candidate CAD genes representing gene programs including epithelial-mesenchymal transformation, ubiquitination, and protein folding as well as BMP and TGFB signaling. Similar methods employed with an independent focused screen targeting one candidate locus at 9p21.3 identified 10 enhancers regulating expression of multiple genes at this location. Detailed molecular studies revealed that two enhancers mediating transcription factor binding and transcriptional regulation contribute to ancestry-specific and sex-specific risk for CAD and the surrogate biomarker vascular calcification. Together, these studies advance our identification of GWAS CAD V2E2G links across the genome, and specific mechanisms of risk at the complex 9p21.3 locus.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Markus Ramste, Chad Weldy, Soumya Kundu, Quanyi Zhao, Daniel Li, Kayla Brand, Disha Sharma, Amanda Ramste, Evelyn Jagoda, Judhajeet Ray, Roxanne Diaz Caceres, James Galante, Andreas R Gschwind, Nuutti Lahtinen, Trieu Nguyen, Junedh M Amrute, Chong Yong Park, Juyong Brian Kim, Minna U Kaikkonen, Nathan O Stitziel, Lars Steinmetz, Anshul Kundaje, Jesse M Engreitz, Thomas Quertermous. 2025-09-02. Enhancer-targeting CRISPR screens at coronary artery disease loci suggest shared mechanisms of disease risk.. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.08.28.25334684

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article