Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 4086651

Evaluations and consequences of assertive behavior.

Abstract

Male and female high assertive and low assertive subjects observed videotaped scenes of actors exhibiting assertive, empathic-assertive, and nonassertive behavior in response to unreasonable requests made by acquaintances. Subjects provided evaluative ratings of actors in the different scenes and rated the likelihood of various consequences that might follow from the actors' behaviors. Generally, empathic-assertive behavior was more positively received than assertive behavior. Empathic assertion received high ratings on dimensions of competence and likeability and was associated with expectations of positive consequences of a social (i.e. requestor's reactions to the actor's behavior) or personal (i.e. the actor's own feelings) nature. In contrast, both empathic-assertion and assertion were believed to result in more negative long-term consequences (i.e. the effect the actor's responses will have on the relationship in the long run) than nonassertive behavior. These effects were modified by the sex of the requestor and the sex and assertiveness of the subject, but unaffected by the sex of the actor. Implications of these findings for research and training of assertive behavior are discussed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L J Zollo, R G Heimberg, R E Becker. 1985. Evaluations and consequences of assertive behavior.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(85)90003-5

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Making communication research matter: what do patients notice, what do patients want, and what do patients need?

OBJECTIVE: To explore limitations of current communication theory by considering different perspectives of researchers, clinicians, patients and teachers of communication. METHOD: Theory development based on limitations of the current communication research literature due to inconsistencies between patient reports and observed communication behavior. RESULTS: While researchers focus on the mechanics and techniques of communication, patients seek relationships in which they experience trust, the right amount of autonomy, caring, and expertise. Patients', physicians', and communication experts' perspectives do not always define the same problems and often point to different solutions. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to studying clinician behaviors and patient perceptions of care, communication research should focus on five additional factors: what patients notice, want and need, and how their perspectives differ from those of physicians and researchers; the context, including illness severity and type and family influences; how complex health systems facilitate and impede communication; patients' influences on physician communication behavior; and habits of mind that promote attentive care.

Assertiveness↗

Using an executive coach to increase leadership effectiveness.

Senior executive nursing roles demand excellence and rigor in both the technical and interpersonal domains of leadership. Many nurse leaders have begun seeking innovative self-development programs and practices to assist them as they strive to improve their effectiveness as leaders in complex organizations. One practice that has gained in popularity is that of engaging a leadership "coach." To understand this relatively new trend in healthcare leadership, the authors interviewed 4 coaches and 4 nurse leaders who had been coached. In this article, they present their overall findings about the effectiveness of coaching as a leadership development tool and offer recommendations for leaders who are interested in engaging a coach.

Assertiveness↗