Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 4061585

Three-dimensional cranial surface reconstructions using high-resolution computed tomography.

Abstract

Until recently, there has been no satisfactory way for anthropologists to visualize intracranial morphology in more than two dimensions without actually "invading" the skull in some manner. Images provided by conventional x-ray and computed tomography (CT) scans are often abstract, flat, two-dimensional representations that fail to reveal three-dimensional relationships. We describe new computer-imaging techniques that reconstruct three-dimensional images from sequential series of narrowly collimated (1-2 mm), high-resolution CT scans of the skull. These computed images represent three-dimensional surface data and can be viewed from any direction. Depth information is encoded in gray scale. In addition, selected portions of the anatomy can be "removed", i.e., made transparent, to allow visualization of previously hidden intracranial morphology. Since the geometric data obtained with the CT scanner are precise, parameters such as linear distances, angles, areas, and volumes can be accurately (and instantaneously) generated. The power and versatility of these computer-imaging techniques are demonstrated by examining living subjects with major craniofacial dysmorphology (Treacher-Collins syndrome and unilateral coronal synostosis); an anthropoid osteological specimen (Gorilla); and a fossil mammal skull.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M W Vannier, G C Conroy, J L Marsh, R H Knapp. 1985. Three-dimensional cranial surface reconstructions using high-resolution computed tomography.. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330670402

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Unerupted maxillary central and lateral incisors and canine with crossbite and asymmetry.

This case report describes the treatment of a patient with unerupted maxillary right central incisor, lateral incisor, and canine in a Class III malocclusion with asymmetry of the lower face. Sequential traction of the 3 unerupted teeth with a light force system was used in the treatment. The results remained stable during the 4-year retention period.

Cephalometry↗

Proportion indices in the craniofacial regions of 284 healthy North American white children between 1 and 5 years of age.

The study's aim was to provide the normal range data on 81 anthropometric proportion indices of the craniofacial complex, separately in boys and girls between 1 and 5 years of age, supplementary to the previously published normal proportion values of the North American white population from 6 to 18 years of age. In the first age group, 17 or 18 boys and 18 or 22 girls were measured. In each age group between 2 and 5 years old, 30 boys and 30 or 31 girls were examined. The normal values of the 81 proportion indices were established with the help of 45 measurements (7 cranial, 13 facial, 4 orbital, 12 nasal, 7 labio-oral, and 2 auricular) taken from 287 healthy children. The data on the normal indices were reported in two groups: areal and interareal. The areal proportions are formed by taking measurements from one particular craniofacial region. Proportions indicating the quality of relation of measurements taken from two craniofacial regions were classified as interareal (N = 36). The basic proportions (N = 13) of the areal one show the relation between the measurements influencing the general view of each craniofacial region. The detailed analysis of the proportionality in the individual regions, carried out with the help of the other measurements within the regions, established 36 additional areal proportion indices. The recommended method of examination is to start with the basic proportions, which offers the determination of the most and least disproportionate craniofacial region, followed by a more comprehensive search for other disproportions with the help of the additional areal proportions (N = 36) and interareal proportions (N = 32).

Cephalometry↗