Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 40236441

Large-scale admixture mapping in the All of Us Research Program improves the characterization of cross-population phenotypic differences.

Abstract

Admixed individuals have largely been understudied in medical research due to their complex genetic ancestries. However, the consideration of admixture can help identify ancestry-enriched genetic associations, delineating some of the genetic underpinnings of cross-population phenotypic variation. To this end, we performed local ancestry inference within the All of Us Research Program to identify individuals with recent admixture between African (AFR) and European (EUR) populations (N=48,921). We identified evidence of local AFR ancestry enrichment at the HLA locus, suggestive of putative selection since admixture. Furthermore, we performed the largest admixture mapping (ADM) efforts in AFR-EUR Admixed individuals for 22 traits, identifying 71 associations between inferred local AFR ancestries and a trait. Variants from published GWAS could only account for 18 (25%) of the ADM associations, highlighting novel loci where ancestral haplotypes explained some phenotypic variation. Previous studies likely have not identified these loci due to the low availability of high-powered GWAS in populations genetically similar to AFR. One such loci was 9q21.33, associated with 1.4-fold risk of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) for carriers of inferred local AFR ancestries at the region. This locus contains the gene SLC28A3, which has previously been linked to kidney function but has never been associated with cross-population ESKD prevalence differences. Together, our results expand upon the existing literature on phenotypic differences between populations, highlighting loci where genetic ancestries play a critical role in the genetic architecture of disease.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ravi Mandla, Zhuozheng Shi, Kangcheng Hou, Ying Wang, Georgia Mies, Alan J Aw, Sinead Cullina, Penn Medicine BioBank, Eimear Kenny, Elizabeth Atkinson, Alicia R Martin, Bogdan Pasaniuc. 2025-04-03. Large-scale admixture mapping in the All of Us Research Program improves the characterization of cross-population phenotypic differences.. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.02.25325115

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article