Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 4017883

Prophylaxis for endocarditis.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

1985-07-15. Prophylaxis for endocarditis.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4017883/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Amoxicillin or erythromycin for the treatment of antenatal chlamydial infection: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of amoxicillin and erythromycin for the treatment of antenatal Chlamydia trachomatis infection by meta-analysis of available trials involving random assignment of subjects. DATA SOURCES: A computer search of English-language abstracts using MEDLINE and the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Database (medical subject heading terms: pregnancy, chlamydia, erythromycin, amoxicillin, antenatal antibiotics) was supplemented with a review of the bibliographies of the relevant articles generated by the computer search. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Five trials were identified, four of which met our inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Trials to be included in this meta-analysis underwent trial quality evaluation and data abstraction. An estimate of the relative risk (RR) was calculated for the dichotomous outcomes using a fixed-effects model. The pooled RR for the effectiveness of amoxicillin compared with erythromycin was 1.11 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.18), and the pooled RR for gastrointestinal side effects of amoxicillin compared with erythromycin was 0.29 (95% CI 0.20-0.42). The pooled RR for gastrointestinal side effects that resulted in discontinuation of therapy of amoxicillin compared with erythromycin was 0.14 (95% CI 0.06-0.36). CONCLUSION: The available data suggest that amoxicillin is more effective than erythromycin for the treatment of antenatal C trachomatis infection and has fewer gastrointestinal side effects, leading to better compliance.

Amoxicillin

Susceptibilities of nontuberculosis mycobacterial species to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid alone and in combination with antimycobacterial agents.

Neither amoxicillin nor clavulanic acid used alone was active at the highest level tested, i.e., 256.0 micrograms/ml, in vitro against 24 isolates of Mycobacterium fortuitum, Mycobacterium kansasii, and Mycobacterium marinum. However, the MIC of an amoxicillin-clavulanic acid combination of 2:1 was < or = 8.0/4.0 micrograms/ml for 50 percent of the isolates tested, with all isolates being inhibited in the range of 4.0/2.0 to 32.0/16.0 micrograms/ml, respectively. Titration of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid with a fixed 2-micrograms/ml concentration of ethambutol resulted in synergistic activity against 3 of 9 isolates of M. fortuitum, 10 of 10 isolates of M. kansasii, and 5 of 5 isolates of M. marinum. This observation was confirmed in a checkerboard analysis in which fractional inhibitory concentrations were < or = 0.5 for 20 of the 24 isolates. Synergistic activity was observed against the other four isolates in one of two trials. On the other hand, titration of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid in the presence of either one or two fixed concentrations of isoniazid, rifampin, cycloserine, tetracycline, or amikacin failed to result in synergism.

Amoxicillin