Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 40166210

Novel insights into the genetic architecture and mechanisms of host/microbiome interactions from a multi-cohort analysis of outbred laboratory rats.

Abstract

The intestinal microbiome influences health and disease. Its composition is affected by host genetics and environmental exposures. Understanding host genetic effects is critical but challenging in humans, due to the difficulty of detecting, mapping and interpreting them. To address this, we analysed host genetic effects in four cohorts of outbred laboratory rats exposed to distinct but controlled environments. We found that polygenic host genetic effects were consistent across environments. We identified three replicated microbiome-associated loci, one of which involved a sialyltransferase gene and Paraprevotella. We found a similar association in a human cohort, between ST6GAL1 and Paraprevotella, both of which have been linked with immune and infectious diseases. Moreover, we found evidence of indirect genetic effects on microbiome phenotypes, which substantially increased their total genetic variance. Finally, we identified a novel mechanism whereby indirect genetic effects can contribute to "missing heritability".

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Helene Tonnele, Denghui Chen, Felipe Morillo, Jorge Garcia-Calleja, Apurva S Chitre, Benjamin B Johnson, Thiago Missfeldt Sanches, Marc Jan Bonder, Antonio Gonzalez, Tomasz Kosciolek, Anthony M George, Wenyan Han, Katie Holl, Aidan Horvath, Keita Ishiwari, Christopher P King, Alexander C Lamparelli, Connor D Martin, Angel Garcia Martinez, Alesa H Netzley, Jordan A Tripi, Tengfei Wang, Elena Bosch, Peter A Doris, Oliver Stegle, Hao Chen, Shelly B Flagel, Paul J Meyer, Jerry B Richards, Terry E Robinson, Leah C Solberg Woods, Oksana Polesskaya, Rob Knight, Abraham A Palmer, Amelie Baud. 2025-09-13. Novel insights into the genetic architecture and mechanisms of host/microbiome interactions from a multi-cohort analysis of outbred laboratory rats.. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.20.644349

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article