Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 3986144

Accident liability.

Abstract

The idea of accident proneness, which originated in the early 1900s, has proved to be ineffectual as an operational concept. Discrete econometric methods may be useful to find out which factors are at work in the process that leads to accidents and whether there are individuals who are more liable to accidents than others.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J B Kuné. 1985. Accident liability.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3986144/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Cognitive failures and performance differences: validation studies of a German version of the cognitive failures questionnaire.

A German version of Broadbent's Cognitive Failures Questionnaire was developed because there was no comparable German instrument. As external validity criteria observable failures in everyday situations were used. The positive correlations were significant but moderate in size. For construct validation, inventories of trait anxiety, coping styles and action control were used. Most of the correlations were significant and in the expected direction. A maximum likelihood factor analysis of the questionnaire suggested that the utility of the total score may be doubtful. The unidimensionality of the construct requires further investigation.

Accident Proneness

Pilots involved in multiple crashes: "accident proneness" revisited.

Analysis of crashes of air taxi and commuter flights explored the controversial issue of "accident proneness." There were 20 pilots who had 2 or more crashes during 1983-88. These pilots (repeaters) and their 42 crashes were compared with 534 pilots who were each involved in a single air taxi or commuter crash during the same period (nonrepeaters). Unexpectedly, repeaters were more experienced pilots with a mean total flight time of 7016 h vs. 5321 for nonrepeaters. Repeaters did not differ from nonrepeaters in the overall proportion of crashes in which pilot performance appeared to be a major factor. Repeaters differed significantly from nonrepeaters as to flight hours during the past 90 d (mean 215 vs. 183 h) and the proportion of their crashes that occurred in Alaska (48% vs. 24%). Alaska repeaters differed from non-Alaska repeaters with regard to the proportion of crashes on takeoff (40% vs 14%) and airport conditions as a factor (50% vs. 18%). The high proportion of repeaters involved in crashes in Alaska, where environmental conditions make flying more hazardous, and the substantially greater recent flight time suggest that the intensity and amount of occupational exposure are major determinants of pilot involvement in more than one crash.

Accident Proneness