Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 3918360

Solid-phase ABO grouping and Rh typing.

Abstract

A solid-phase adherence method (SPAM) for ABO grouping and Rh typing of red cells (RBCs) has been developed. Adherence reactions were read spectrophotometrically and interpreted by a computer. The SPAM had a 99.6 percent correlation with conventional microplate agglutination methods for ABO grouping and Rh typing. The increased sensitivity of the SPAM was demonstrated because it directly detected Du-positive RBCs and weak subgroups of A and B.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L T Sinor, J M Rachel, M L Beck, W L Bayer, W M Coenen, F V Plapp. Solid-phase ABO grouping and Rh typing.. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1537-2995.1985.25185116494.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

H (0) blood group determinant is present on soluble human L-selectin expressed in BHK-cells.

In the present study we show that the H (0) blood group determinant Fuc alpha1-2Gal beta1-4GlcNAc beta1-R is present on N-linked glycans of soluble human L-selectin recombinantly expressed in baby hamster kidney (BHK) cells. The glycans were isolated using complementary HPLC techniques and characterized by a combination of exoglycosidase digestion and mass spectrometry. The linkage of the fucose residues was determined by incubation of the glycans with specific fucosidases. The H blood determinant Fuc alpha1-2Gal beta1-4GlcNAc beta1 was detected for bi-, 2,4 branched tri- and tetraantennary structures. To our knowledge, the proposed oligosaccharide structures represent a new glycosylation motif for recombinant glycoproteins expressed on BHK cells.

ABO Blood-Group System

Safe transplantation of blood type A2 livers to blood type O recipients.

BACKGROUND: Transplantation of blood type A subgroup 2 (A2) livers into non-A recipients has not been reported previously. A2 to O renal transplantation has been reported, with early results including some accelerated rejections and graft losses. This has led some to selectively offer A2 renal transplantation only for patients with low anti-A titers. Given the different clinical behavior of liver allografts to preformed antibody, we felt that such restriction was unnecessary. METHODS: We performed six cases of A2 to O liver transplantation with no augmented immunomodulation or restriction with regard to antibody titers. Clinical courses, anti-A titers, rejection rates, and graft and patient survival were evaluated. RESULTS: All six patients had high pretransplant anti-A titers (>1:8), and all six grafts functioned normally. There were nine rejections in the six patients, of which three were severe (steroid-resistant) and five were late (>90 days). No rejection was vascular, and no grafts were lost, with mean follow-up of 665 days. In one patient who had anti-A antibody measured at the time of rejection IGM titers increased from baseline. Currently all patients are home with normal function. CONCLUSIONS: We found that transplantation of blood group A2 livers into blood group O recipients is safe and can be performed without graft loss and without regard to anti-A titer level. The rate of acute cellular rejection is high in this small series, and a significant proportion of these events were late or required OKT-3. We did not rely on plasmapheresis or anti-A titer determinations. However, the potential for late rejection prompts us to consider the addition of a third immunosuppressive agent. The transplantation of A2 livers into O recipients can partially compensate for the more frequent use of O livers in recipients from other blood groups.

ABO Blood-Group System