Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 3833036

[The external fronto-ethmoidal approach].

Abstract

A lateral fronto-ethmoidal approach simultaneously exposing the frontal sinus and the nasal fossae appears to be a necessity for the surgical treatment of fronto-ethmoidal pathology. It is possible to fashion an osteo-plastic flap in the fronto-naso-maxillary region. The technique of the approach is described. The operation leaves no ocular functional sequelae and the scar is minimal. Twenty one operations by fronto-nasal flap approach are described, 10 for benign tumours of the fronto-ethmoidal system and 11 with the aim of re-aerating the frontal sinus for cases of complicated or iatrogenic serious sinusitis. The results are studied. The indications of the fronto-nasal flap are described: In tumour pathology, this technique must be used for osteomas and mucoceles of the fronto-ethmoidal system as soon as the ethmoidal component reaches or goes beyond the middle ethmoid. If the fronto-ethmoidal lesion only involves the anterior ethmoid, it is then accessible via simple frontal flap. Inverted papillomas which require wide exposure should also be treated via this approach. In infectious pathology, the fronto-nasal flap offers the possibility, after eradication of fronto-ethmoidal lesions and calibration of the naso-frontal canal, of re-aeration of the frontal sinus which seems preferable to its exclusion. The possibility of re-aeration of the frontal sinus by an osteo-plastic procedure is progress in comparison with lost bone craniotomy procedures.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Cannoni, M Zanaret, J M Thomassin, C Scavennec, G Foucault, A Pech. 1985. [The external fronto-ethmoidal approach].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3833036/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Scalp reconstruction.

Scalp reconstruction after oncologic resection can be challenging. Wide surgical resections, in combination with co-morbid conditions such as infected alloplastic material, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, or devascularized bone after craniotomy necessitate healthy, vascularized tissues for reconstruction. Although primary closure is feasible in some cases, the mainstay of treatment involves local tissue rearrangement with or without split thickness skin grafting. In addition, free tissue transfer is an important adjunct to therapy in patients with poor local tissues. Careful analysis of the defect and local tissues can help tailor the method of reconstruction and result in satisfactory closure in a majority of patients. Current techniques used for scalp reconstruction after surgical ablation are the subject of this review.

Craniotomy↗

Comparison of craniotomy and craniectomy in patients with acute subdural haematoma.

Despite the increasing acceptance of craniectomy in patients with traumatic brain injury, the value of early decompressive craniectomy in patients with acute subdural haematoma is still under debate. In this retrospective study, we reviewed 180 patients with traumatic acute subdural haematoma, 111 of whom were treated with haematoma evacuation via craniotomy and 69 of whom were treated with early decompressive craniectomy. Due to the higher incidence of signs of herniation for patients in the craniectomy group, the mortality rate in this group was higher than that in the craniotomy group (53% vs. 32.3%). However, overall there was no significant difference in outcome between the two groups. Age and clinical signs of herniation were significantly associated with an unfavourable outcome, regardless of the type of surgery. Decompressive craniectomy did not seem to have a therapeutic advantage over craniotomy in traumatic acute subdural haematoma.

Craniotomy↗