Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 3814732

Sample size for individually matched case-control studies.

Abstract

The standard formulas used to calculate sample size for an individually matched case-control study assume a constant probability of exposure throughout the pool of possible controls. We propose new formulas that allow for heterogeneity in the probability of exposure among controls in different matched sets. Since matching factors are suspected of being confounders, they are expected to divide the total population into subgroups with different proportions exposed. Thus, the assumption of homogeneity of exposure among controls, made by the currently used formulas, is inconsistent with the assumptions used to design a matched study. The proposed formulas avoid this inconsistency. We present an example to illustrate how heterogeneity can affect the required sample size.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R A Parker, D J Bregman. 1986. Sample size for individually matched case-control studies.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3814732/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Factors that explain the power line configuration wiring code-childhood leukemia association: what would they look like?

We explore the question of how to characterize a factor that would explain the patterns of wire code-childhood leukemia association observed in three major United States case-control studies. In positive studies, such a factor needs to be more prevalent in "high" wire codes than "low" whereas in negative studies, the factor should not be correlated to wire code. These concepts are quantified and we use these results to characterize potential factors that might explain the wire code-childhood leukemia association. We then re-evaluate findings from a survey of correlates of wire code in Connecticut with respect to potential for explaining the wire code-leukemia association. Under the presumption that the Connecticut correlations apply to the populations in which a wire code-leukemia association has been observed, only age and type of home are correlated enough to be potential explanatory factors. In particular, it appears very unlikely that traffic density can explain a significant portion of the wire code association. We suggest that correlation studies can be useful for identifying potential explanatory factors, but they must be done in regions where a wire code-childhood leukemia association has been observed.

Biometry↗

A quick method for computing approximate thresholds for quantitative trait loci detection.

This article proposes a quick method for computing approximate threshold levels that control the genome-wise type I error rate of tests for quantitative trait locus (QTL) detection in interval mapping (IM) and composite interval mapping (CIM). The procedure is completely general, allowing any population structure to be handled, e.g., BC(1), advanced backcross, F(2), and advanced intercross lines. Its main advantage is applicability in complex situations where no closed form approximate thresholds are available. Extensive simulations demonstrate that the method works well over a range of situations. Moreover, the method is computationally inexpensive and may thus be used as an alternative to permutation procedures. For given values of the likelihood-ratio (LR)-profile, computations involve just a few seconds on a Pentium PC. Computations are simple to perform, requiring only the values of the LR statistics (or LOD scores) of a QTL scan across the genome as input. For CIM, the window size and the position of cofactors are also needed. For the approximation to work well, it is suggested that scans be performed with a relatively small step size between 1 and 2 cM.

Biometry↗

Minimum detectable activity in gamma-ray spectrometry--statistical properties and limits of applicability.

Some statistical properties of the essential physical quantity "Minimum Detectable Activity" were analyzed, as well as the limits of its applicability in gamma-ray spectrometry. It was shown that the Minimum Detectable Activity is not linear with respect to the quantity of the measured sample and it is advisable not to calculate the Minimum Detectable Activity per unit mass or volume (in Bq kg-1 or Bq cm-3). The MDA has a clear decisive relevance to samples that have an identical geometry and chemical composition with that of the sample that was used to derive the MDA. The relative uncertainty of the Minimum Detectable Activity is approximately +/- 32%. It is recommended not to exclude from evaluations those results that are below minimum detectable activities.

Biometry↗