Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 3694792

[Volume effect models in radiation therapy].

Abstract

In radiation therapy, it is clearly recognized that the isoeffect dose of normal tissue decreases with the increase of the area or the volume of tissue irradiated, so that a marked change in therapeutic ratio occurs when large tumor is treated. This relationship has been called "volume effect" and several models such as power law relationship, volume dose histogram and integral probability have been developed to quantify the effect. Although the delivery of these models are based on clinical data, there is a wide variation between models and each model can be applied under restricted conditions. In order to develop reliable volume effect model theoretically and empirically, further studies with enough and suitable clinical data will be required.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Sakata. 1987. [Volume effect models in radiation therapy].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3694792/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Quantitative measurement of post-irradiation neck fibrosis based on the young modulus: description of a new method and clinical results.

BACKGROUND: Postirradiation fibrosis is one of the most common late effects of radiation therapy for patients with head and neck carcinoma. An objective and quantitative method for its measurement is much desired, but the criteria currently used to score fibrosis are mostly semiquantitative and partially subjective. METHODS: The Young Modulus (YM) is a physical parameter that characterizes the deformability of material to stress. The authors measured the YM in soft tissues of the neck, at defined reference points, using an ultrasound probe and computer algorithm that quantified the indentation (deformation) on tissue due to a measured, applied force. One hundred five patients who had received previous radiation therapy to the entire neck were assessed, and the results were compared with the hand palpation scores and with a functional parameter represented by the range of neck rotation, and all results were correlated with symptoms. RESULTS: The YM was obtained successfully in all patients examined. It had a significant positive correlation with the palpation score and a significant negative correlation with the range of neck rotation. The YM was significantly higher on the side of the neck that received a boost dose of radiation, although the corresponding palpation scores were similar. The results of all three measurement methods were correlated with symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Postirradiation neck fibrosis can be measured in absolute units based on the YM. The results showed a significant correlation with hand palpation scores, with restriction of neck rotation, and with symptoms. Compared with the palpation method, the YM is more quantitative, objective, focused on small subregions, and better discriminates regions subject to differential radiation dose levels. Its inclusion in the Analytic category of the Late Effects of Normal Tissues-SOMA system should be considered to facilitate comparative studies.

Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation↗