Malignant pleural effusions.

M A Friedman; E Slater

doi:10.1016/s0305-7372(78)80006-1

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 367592

Malignant pleural effusions.

M A Friedman·E Slater

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Recurrent malignant pleural effusion is a relatively common problem that often occurs many months before the terminal stages of a patient's malignant disease. Despite careful evaluation, it is often impossible to identify the exact physiologic cause of an effusion and difficult to identify a pragmatic course of therapy. Aggressive management including chest tube drainage, with or without instillation of inflammation-inducing drugs, and radiotherapy or surgery in selected cases is indicated for palliative treatment and probably for increased survival. In formulating a treatment plan, attention should be given to a variety of factors including pathogenic forces in the formation of malignant pleural effusion, tissue type of the metastatic malignancy, general clinical status of the patient, the presence of pleural loculations and adhesions, and the exclusion of other non-malignant causes of pleural effusion.

Explore related subjects

Antineoplastic Agents Humans Neoplasm Metastasis Neoplasms Pleural Effusion Prognosis Suction Journal Article Review

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

M A Friedman, E Slater. 1978. Malignant pleural effusions.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0305-7372(78)80006-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2021

Deep generative neural network for accurate drug response imputation.

Drug response differs substantially in cancer patients due to inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity. Particularly, transcriptome context, especially tumor microenvironment, has been shown playing a significant role in shaping the actual treatment outcome. In this study, we develop a deep variational autoencoder (VAE) model to compress thousands of genes into latent vectors in a low-dimensional space. We then demonstrate that these encoded vectors could accurately impute drug response, outperform standard signature-gene based approaches, and appropriately control the overfitting problem. We apply rigorous quality assessment and validation, including assessing the impact of cell line lineage, cross-validation, cross-panel evaluation, and application in independent clinical data sets, to warrant the accuracy of the imputed drug response in both cell lines and cancer samples. Specifically, the expression-regulated component (EReX) of the observed drug response achieves high correlation across panels. Using the well-trained models, we impute drug response of The Cancer Genome Atlas data and investigate the features and signatures associated with the imputed drug response, including cell line origins, somatic mutations and tumor mutation burdens, tumor microenvironment, and confounding factors. In summary, our deep learning method and the results are useful for the study of signatures and markers of drug response.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed2003

Killing tumours by ceramide-induced apoptosis: a critique of available drugs.

Over 1000 research papers have described the production of programmed cell death (apoptosis) by interventions that elevate the cell content of ceramide (Cer). Other interventions, which lower cellular Cer, have been found to interfere with apoptosis induced by other agents. Some studies have shown that slowing the formation of proliferation-stimulating sphingolipids also induces apoptosis. These relationships are due to the two different aspects of Cer: Cer itself produces apoptosis, but metabolic conversion of Cer into either sphingosine 1-phosphate or glucosphingolipids leads to cell proliferation. The balance between these two aspects is missing in cancer cells, and yet intervention by stimulating or blocking only one or two of the pathways in Cer metabolism is very likely to fail. This results from two properties of cancer cells: their high mutation rate and the preferential survival of the most malignant cells. Tumours treated with only one or two drugs that elevate Cer can adjust the uncontrolled processes to either maintain or to 'aggravate' the excessive growth, angiogenesis and metastasis characteristics of tumours. These treatments might simply elevate the production of growth factors, receptors and other substances that reduce the effectiveness of Cer. Tumour cells that do not adapt in this way undergo apoptosis, leaving the adapted cells free to grow and, ultimately, to 'subdue' their host. Thus it is important to kill every type of cancer cell present in the tumour rapidly and simultaneously, using as many different agents to control as many pathways as possible. To aid this approach, this article catalogues many of the drugs that act on different aspects of Cer metabolism. The techniques described here may lead to the development of practical chemotherapy for cancer and other diseases of excess proliferation.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed2003

Tyrosine-nitration of caspase 3 and cytochrome c does not suppress apoptosis induction in squamous cell carcinoma cells.

The influence of tyrosine nitration of cytochrome c and caspase 3 on apoptosis induction was investigated in an established squamous carcinoma cell line, OSC-4. The intracellular NO and O2(-) levels were increased up to about 110-120% and 140-180% of the control levels, respectively, after the treatment of OSC-4 cells with 5-FU (100 microg/ml), PLM (10 microg/ml), CDDP (10 microg/ml), or gamma-rays (20 Gy). The treatment of OSC-4 cells with ONOO(-) (1 mM) and the above anticancer agents induced tyrosine nitration of 14, 32 kDa protein among others and nitration of tyrosine residues of cytochrome c and caspase 3 was identified by the Western blotting of immunoprecipitates obtained by antibodies to these proapoptotic proteins. When cytochrome c and procaspase 3 were treated with ONOO(-), tyrosine nitration was increased in a ONOO(-)-dose dependent manner. Tyrosine nitration of cleaved (17 kDa) caspase 3, however, was not induced by ONOO(-). Procaspase 3 in the cytosol of HeLa cells was activated by the addition of ONOO(-)-treated as well as ONOO(-)-untreated cytochrome c. In addition, cleavage of ICAD and PARP were not suppressed in OSC-4 cells by pretreatment with ONOO(-). Activity of cleaved caspase 3 was not suppressed at low concentrations or by treatment with ONOO(-) or NO donors, SIN-1 and SNP. Furthermore, apoptosis of OSC-4 cells by the anticancer agents was not suppressed by ONOO(-). In conclusion, these results suggest that nitration of tyrosine residues of cytochrome c and procaspase 3 is induced by chemoradiotherapy but their nitration does not suppress cancer cell apoptosis.

Antineoplastic Agents↗