Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 3565218

Pressure ulcers.

Abstract

Pressure sores occur when prolonged pressure or shear is applied to the skin of predisposed patients. Prevention requires identification of patients at risk and institution of thorough surveillance and nursing care. Once pressure ulcers occur, treatment decisions are based on the depth of the ulceration. Management consists of motivating the staff, relieving the pressure, debriding the wound, lowering wound bacterial counts and treating complications.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G C Xakellis, P Garzone. 1987. Pressure ulcers.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3565218/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Vascular catheter site care: the clinical and economic benefits of chlorhexidine gluconate compared with povidone iodine.

The use of chlorhexidine gluconate solution for vascular catheter insertion site care reduces the risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection by one-half, compared with povidone iodine. Our objective was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of chlorhexidine gluconate versus povidone iodine. We used data from randomized, controlled trials, meta-analyses, and epidemiologic studies to construct a decision analysis model. We estimated that use of chlorhexidine, rather than povidone, for central catheter site care resulted in a 1.6% decrease in the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection, a 0.23% decrease in the incidence of death, and savings of 113 dollars per catheter used. For peripheral catheter site care, the results were similar, although the differences were smaller. The results were found to be robust on multivariate sensitivity analyses. Use of chlorhexidine gluconate in place of the current standard solution for vascular catheter site care is a simple and cost-effective method of improving patient safety in the hospital setting.

Anti-Infective Agents, Local↗

In vitro evaluation of different chemical agents for the decontamination of gutta-percha cones.

This study evaluated the effectiveness of three disinfectants used in Dentistry for decontamination of gutta-percha cones. Sixty gutta-percha cones were contaminated with standardized pure cultures of five species of microorganisms (Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, Candida albicans ATCC CBS-ICB/USP 562, Bacillus subtilis spores ATCC 6633 and Streptococcus mutans ATCC 25175). The cones were treated with 10% polyvinylpyrrolidone-iodine aqueous solution (PVP-I; Groups 1 and 2), 5.25% aqueous sodium hypochlorite (Groups 3 and 4) and paraformaldehyde tablets (Group 5). All chemical agents were efficient for the cold sterilization of gutta-percha cones in short time periods.

Anti-Infective Agents, Local↗