PubMed · 3474729
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
E Deveaux. 1986. [Root anatomy].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3474729/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The degree and configuration of canal curvature was studied in the mesial roots of 100 randomly selected mandibular first and second molars. The teeth were radiographed in buccolingual (clinical) and mesiodistal (proximal) directions with #8 K files in place. One hundred percent of the specimens demonstrated curvature in both views. No correlation in degree of curvature was found to exist between the clinical and proximal views. Secondary curvature, in a direction opposite to that of the principle curve, was seen more frequently in the proximal view. In the proximal view, canals exhibited greater mean curvature than in the clinical view 38% of the time. Weine type II morphology (two canals, one foramen) demonstrated the greatest range in canal curvature when viewed from the proximal. Coronal flaring with Canal Master rotary instruments to a level just coronal to the curve significantly reduced the severity of curvatures in both views for most cases.
In this study, 100 mandibular central and lateral incisors were used to determine the number of root canals and their types, the ramifications of the root canal, the location of apical foramina, and the frequency of apical deltas. The teeth were immersed in India ink, decalcified, and cleared. The examination of root canal systems of the teeth was based on Vertucci's classification. Two more root canal types which are not defined in that classification have also been determined and grouped as new types.
An apparatus was designed for experimental dental radiography, which permitted separate adjustment of the subject, target and film. The precision of the apparatus was tested by radiographing a test subject, consisting of small steel globes embedded in a plastic plate. The subject was placed in the apparatus and exposed 30 times on dental X-ray film with different adjustments of angles and distances. All exposures were repeated after readjustment of the same form. Three linear distances between pairs of the projected steel globes were selected and measured on each radiograph. Depending on the different orientations of film, target and subject, the distances measured ranged from 9.0-11.1 mm, from 7.0-10.7 mm and from 12.7-17.3 mm, respectively. From the measurements on the radiographs the error of method was calculated to be 0.07-0.08 mm and the error of measurement to be 0.05-0.06 mm. The precision of the apparatus was thus found to be adequate for measurement of differences in small, but clinically relevant, distances.