Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 3389784

Informed consent: Part III.

Abstract

Perioperative nurses are concerned about their patients understanding the procedures they will undergo. The legal system agrees that patients have the right to be informed about and consent to surgical procedures; informed consent is a legal right. No state, however, has recognized a formal role for the perioperative nurse in the enforcement of this right. Case law has consistently found that the necessary interchange for informed consent is vested in the patient-physician relationship, and it views broadening this legal responsibility as more disruptive than beneficial. When everyone is responsible, it is more difficult to ensure that someone actually talks to the patient. Present law makes that someone the surgeon. The role of the perioperative nurse includes informing the surgeon if the patient's informed consent has not been documented in accordance with agency policy, documenting having done so, and taking any additional actions required by agency policy. Perioperative nurses who suspect overreaching by surgeons should inform their administrators. The perioperative nurse should not unilaterally get involved in the physician-patient relationship. The patient has sought the services of the surgeon, not the nurse.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E K Murphy. 1988. Informed consent: Part III.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-2092(07)66324-8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Retained foreign bodies from the view of the OR nurse].

Patient safety in the operating room is of high priority for the surgical team and for all healthcare workers involved. Counting procedures contribute to minimizing potential risks for the patients, especially in preventing them from leaving the operating room with retained, unintended foreign bodies. A total of 64% of operating room nurses involved in a survey are reported as having been involved in a surgical procedure in which the correct count prevented foreign bodies from being left in the patient. In addition, the strengths and potential weak points of the counting procedures could be identified. The results of the survey and drafts for a standard counting control as well as procedural recommendations are presented for discussion. A recommendation can be provided for each surgical department in order to check their own counting methods for avoiding potential risks.

Documentation↗