Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Family”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Apolipoprotein B is associated with metabolic syndrome in Chinese families with familial combined hyperlipidemia, familial hypertriglyceridemia and familial hypercholesterolemia.

There is a paucity of data concerning the metabolic syndrome (MetS) in families with familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCHL), familial hypertriglyceridemia (FHTG), familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and normolipidemic families in China. This study investigated the prevalence of MetS in these families and explored potential factors relevant to MetS. We recruited 70 families with 560 individuals > or = 20 years of age, including 43 FCHL families with 379 individuals, 3 FHTG families with 30 individuals, 16 FH families with 102 individuals and 8 normolipidemic families with 49 individuals. The definition of MetS is determined using modified criteria of National Cholesterol Education Program substituting body mass index for waist circumference. MetS is identified in 60.7% of FCHL patients and 71.4% of FHTG patients. The prevalence of MetS in family members is 36.7% for FCHL, 33.3% for FHTG, 17.6% for FH and 16.3% for normolipidemic families, with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.97 (95% CI 1.29-7.07, P=0.007) in FCHL families compared with normolipidemic families. Apolipoprotein B (apoB) is associated with MetS by multiple logistic analysis with an OR of 1.05 (1.03-1.07, P<0.001) in FCHL families, OR of 1.26 (1.03-1.55, P=0.026) in FHTG and OR of 1.07 (1.01-1.12, P=0.014) in FH families, independent of variables including age, gender, apolipoprotein A1, and low density lipoprotein cholesterol. Apolipoprotein A1 provided an OR of 0.95 (0.94-0.97, P<0.001) in FCHL families and OR of 0.94 (0.90-0.97, P=0.011) in FH families, but neither in FHTG nor in normolipidemic families (both P>0.05). Thus, apoB may be regarded as a relevant factor in the assessment of MetS in FCHL, FHTG and FH families. However, this finding needs to be verified by prospective studies in diverse ethnicities and warrants additional studies to elucidate possible mechanisms linking apoB to MetS.

Adult↗

Impact of family demands and family strengths and capabilities on family well-being and adaptation after critical injury.

BACKGROUND: Increases in demands on patients' family members that are not reduced by family strengths may contribute to decreases in family adaptation and complicate patients' recovery after trauma. The purpose of this study was to examine family demands (prior stressors and severity of patients' injuries) and family strengths and capabilities (hardiness, resources, coping, and problem-solving communication) associated with outcomes of family well-being and adaptation. METHODS: A multivariate, descriptive design based on the Resiliency Model of Family Stress was used. A convenience sample of family members (N = 51) of adult patients participated within the first 2 days of critical injury. Family demands were measured with the Family Inventory of Life Events and Changes and the Acute Physiology, Age, and Chronic Health Evaluation III. Family strengths were measured with the Family Hardiness Index, Family Inventory of Resources for Management, Family Crisis Oriented Personal Evaluation Scale, and Family Problem Solving Communication Index. Family adaptation outcomes were measured with the Family Well Being Index and Family Adaptation Scale. RESULTS: Increases in family demands were significantly related to decreases in family strengths and family adaptation. Family demands scores accounted for 40% of the variance in family well-being scores. The only significant family strength variable influencing family adaptation was problem-solving communication. CONCLUSIONS: Increases in family demands seem to be an important indicator of the amount of assistance a family may need. Interventions that help mobilize family strengths, such as problem-solving communication, may be effective in promoting the adaptation of families of critically injured patients.

APACHE↗

Family functioning assessed by family members in Finnish families of heart patients.

BACKGROUND: The role of family is central to the wellbeing and health of individuals. Family attitudes, habits and routines affect the way individuals promote their health. Family functioning and family health are threatened when one family member develops heart disease. AIMS: The aim of the study was to describe family functioning and to ascertain factors related to family functioning of families with heart patient as assessed by family members. METHODS: Data collection was done using a questionnaire (FAFHES) in 2000. The sample consisted of 161 family members of patients receiving treatment on two medical wards. The data were analysed by means and tested by parametric and non-parametric tests. The multivariate method used was stepwise regression analysis. RESULTS: The better the family values were materialized and the greater the family's contribution to family health, the better the family's functioning is. Concrete aid was also related to family health. The more concrete aid the family received from nurses, the better family functioning is. When the background variables were included, values and activities remained in the model, but two new variables explained family functioning: family member's age and knowledge of health issues. The older the family member is and the better the knowledge in the family is, the better is family functioning. CONCLUSION: Family functioning of families with heart patients can be supported and developed by family nursing, e.g. concrete aid from nurses. Other aspects of support, e.g. consideration of family member's age and knowledge of health issues also need to be further considered and studied as the basis of care.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

Usefulness of cardiovascular family history data for population-based preventive medicine and medical research (the Health Family Tree Study and the NHLBI Family Heart Study).

Detailed medical family history data have been proposed to be effective in identifying high-risk families for targeted intervention. With use of a validated and standardized quantitative family risk score (FRS), the degree of familial aggregation of coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, hypertension, and diabetes was obtained from 122,155 Utah families and 6,578 Texas families in the large, population-based Health Family Tree Study, and 1,442 families in the NHLBI Family Heart Study in Massachusetts, Minnesota, North Carolina, and Utah. Utah families with a positive family history of CHD (FRS > or =0.5) represented only 14% of the general population but accounted for 72% of persons with early CHD (men before age 55 years, women before age 65 years) and 48% of CHD at all ages. For strokes, 11% of families with FRS > or =0.5 accounted for 86% of early strokes (<75 years) and 68% of all strokes. Analyses of >5,000 families sampled each year in Utah for 14 years demonstrated a gradual decrease in the frequency of a strong positive family history of CHD (-26%/decade) and stroke (-15%/decade) that paralleled a decrease in incidence rates (r = 0.86, p <0.001 for CHD; r = 0.66, p <0.01 for stroke). Because of the collaboration of schools, health departments, and medical schools, the Health Family Tree Study proved to be a highly cost-efficient method for identifying 17,064 CHD-prone families and 13,106 stroke-prone families (at a cost of about $27 per high-risk family) in whom well-established preventive measures can be encouraged. We conclude that most early cardiovascular events in a population occur in families with a positive family history of cardiovascular disease. Family history collection is a validated and relatively inexpensive tool for family-based preventive medicine and medical research.

Adult↗

Family of origin environments in two clinical samples of survivors of intra-familial, extra-familial, and both types of sexual abuse.

OBJECTIVE: It has been suggested that survivors of ongoing childhood sexual abuse (CSA) tend to have been reared in ineffective family environments that render them particularly vulnerable to maltreatment and which foster psychological difficulties beyond those accounted for solely by their abuse. If this conjecture is valid, one would expect that the family of origin environments of CSA survivors would be disturbed whether their abuser was intra-familial or extra-familial. To assess this hypothesis, two studies compared the childhood family of origin environments and supportive parenting characteristics of a clinical sample of women sexually abused by family members only (the intra-familial group), by non-family members only (the extra-familial group), and by both family and non-family members (the "both" group). METHOD: Study 1 compared the three groups (total N = 213) using the Family Environment Scale (FES). Study 2 compared groups (total N = 86) on the positive parenting scales of the Exposure to Abusive and Supportive Environments Parenting Inventory (EASE-PI). RESULTS: In Study 1, multivariate analyses indicated significant differences on the independence, cohesion, and conflict subscales of the FES. Pairwise comparisons revealed that the extra-familial group reported significantly higher levels of family independence and lower levels of conflict than the other two groups. In addition, the extra-familial group reported higher levels of cohesion than the intra-familial group. However, the effect sizes of these comparisons were extremely small. In Study 2, multivariate analyses revealed no group differences on the EASE-PI scales. CONCLUSIONS: Low effect sizes on the three significant FES scales, non-significance on the remaining seven FES scales, and non-significance on the EASE-PI scales suggest that there is considerable similarity in the family of origin environments of adult female CSA survivors seeking therapy regardless of whether their perpetrators were family members, non-family members, or both family and non-family members.

Adult↗

The use of the family APGAR in screening for family dysfunction in a family practice center.

The Family APGAR questionnaire was used to determine the prevalence of self-reported family dysfunction present in patients who attended a family practice center, to determine whether knowledge of the Family APGAR score increased the frequency with which family physicians evaluated family functioning and diagnosed family dysfunction, and to determine whether certain psychosomatic complaints associated with family dysfunction were more common in a group of patients with a Family APGAR score of less than 6. To achieve these purposes, all patients entering the center were asked to fill out a Family APGAR questionnaire during the month of March 1984. Physicians learned of the results in a randomly selected one half of all cases. A chart review was conducted one month later. Twenty-four percent of patients reported family dysfunction (APGAR less than 6). Knowledge of the APGAR score did not increase the frequency with which physicians evaluated family function (20 percent known vs 17 percent unknown) or diagnosed family dysfunction (6.3 percent known vs 6.4 percent unknown). Patients with self-reported family dysfunction as defined by the Family APGAR did not have more psychosomatic complaints noted in their charts than patients without self-reported family dysfunction. Family dysfunction is a common problem in family practice patients, it is recorded infrequently in patients' charts, and knowledge of the results of a screening device does not increase the frequency with which family dysfunction is noticed.

False Negative Reactions↗

Family functioning in the families of psychiatric patients: a comparison with nonclinical families.

OBJECTIVE: To examine family functioning in the families of psychiatric patients. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Families of psychiatric patients and nonclinical families were compared. There were 60 families in each group. The instrument included a semistructured interview of family functioning and the Chulalongkorn Family Inventory (CFI), a self-report questionnaire designed to assess the perception of one's family. RESULTS: From the assessment by semistructured interview, 83.3% of psychiatric families and 45.0% of nonclinical families were found to be dysfunctional in at least one dimension. The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The average number of dysfunctional dimensions in the psychiatric families was significantly higher than in the nonclinical control group, 3.5 +/- 1.9 and 0.98 +/- 1.5 respectively, p < 0.0001. The CFI scores of the psychiatric families were significantly lower than the control group, reflecting poor family functioning. The dysfunctions were mostly in the following dimensions: problem-solving, communication, affective responsiveness, affective involvement, and behavior control. Psychiatric families faced more psychosocial stressors and the average number of stressors was higher than the control families, 88.3% vs. 56.7% and 4.2 +/- 2.7 vs. 1.3 +/- 1.47 stressors respectively, p < 0.0001. CONCLUSION: Family functioning of psychiatric patients was less healthy than the nonclinical control. The present study underlined the significance of family assessment and family intervention in the comprehensive care of psychiatric patients.

Case-Control Studies↗

Family satisfaction with family conferences about end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: increased proportion of family speech is associated with increased satisfaction.

OBJECTIVE: Family members of critically ill patients report dissatisfaction with family-clinician communication about withdrawing life support, yet limited data exist to guide clinicians in this communication. The hypothesis of this analysis was that increased proportion of family speech during ICU family conferences would be associated with increased family satisfaction. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: We identified family conferences in intensive care units of four Seattle hospitals during which discussions about withdrawing life support were likely to occur. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 214 family members from 51 different families. There were 36 different physicians leading the conferences, as some physicians led more than one conference. INTERVENTIONS: Fifty-one conferences were audiotaped. MEASUREMENTS: We measured the duration of time that families and clinicians spoke during the conference. All participants were given a survey assessing satisfaction with communication. RESULTS: The mean conference time was 32.0 mins with an sd of 14.8 mins and a range from 7 to 74 mins. On average, family members spoke 29% and clinicians spoke 71% of the time. Increased proportion of family speech was significantly associated with increased family satisfaction with physician communication. Increased proportion of family speech was also associated with decreased family ratings of conflict with the physician. There was no association between the duration of the conference and family satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that allowing family members more opportunity to speak during conferences may improve family satisfaction. Future studies should assess the effect of interventions to increase listening by critical care clinicians on the quality of communication and the family experience.

Communication↗

[The relationship between the family system and the family coping among families with a chronically ill child].

The purposes of this study were to identify the family coping strategies among families with chronically ill children and to explore the relationship between the family system (variables), the family burden and the family coping. One hundred fifty-two families with chronically ill children were studied. The Japanese version of Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales II and the Family Coping Behavior Inventory II were used. The result were 1) the family cohesion and adaptability in families with a chronically ill child tended to be lower than normal families; 2) the integration coping pattern was positively related with family cohesion and the family burden; 3) the problem solving coping pattern was positively related with the family burden; 4) the normalization coping pattern was negatively related with the family burden and positively related with the family cohesion; 5) the crisis response coping pattern was positively related with the family burden and negatively related with the family cohesion.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

Influence of genes, nevi, and sun sensitivity on melanoma risk in a family sample unselected by family history and in melanoma-prone families.

BACKGROUND: Few family studies have investigated the effects of genetic, environmental, and host factors on melanoma risk, and most have been restricted to high-risk families. We assessed the role of these factors on melanoma risk in two types of families: families ascertained through melanoma probands but unselected by family history and melanoma-prone families. METHODS: Data on pigmentary traits, nevus phenotypes, exposure to sun, and reactions to sunlight were collected from 295 families unselected by family history and 53 melanoma-prone families. We modeled melanoma risk using a logistic regressive model incorporating the effect of a melanoma-predisposing gene, familial dependence, and potential risk factors (e.g., pigmentary traits, nevus phenotypes, history of sun exposure, skin reactions to sunlight). Maximum-likelihood estimates of the parameters of the regressive model were used to compute odds ratios associated with each risk factor and age-specific melanoma risk depending on the genotype at the melanoma-predisposing gene and the effects of risk factors. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: In the families unselected by family history, there was statistically significant evidence (P<.001) for a dominant gene, with melanoma risk reaching 0.49 and 0.67 by age 80 years in male and female gene carriers, respectively. Melanoma risk was statistically significantly influenced by total nevi (odds ratio of hazard function [OR] = 5.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.47 to 8.99), sun exposure (OR = 5.37, 95% CI = 4.44 to 6.36), and sunburn interacting with the gene (OR = 26.31, 95% CI = 7.56 to 99.22 in gene carriers and OR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.36 to 2.03 in noncarriers). Twenty of the 53 melanoma-prone families had cosegregating mutations in CDKN2A, a gene known to be associated with melanoma. In these 53 families, three risk factors in addition to CDKN2A mutations increased melanoma risk: dysplastic nevi (OR = 2.32, 95% CI = 2.08 to 2.58), total nevi (OR = 1.99, 95% CI = 1.61 to 2.20) and sunburn (OR = 5.16, 95% CI = 4.82 to 5.52). CONCLUSIONS: Together, a melanoma-predisposing gene (identified as being CDKN2A in melanoma-prone families), number of nevi and/or dysplastic nevi, and sun-related covariates influence melanoma risk in both families unselected by family history and melanoma-prone families.

Adult↗

Family stress and family strengths: a comparison of single- and two-parent families with handicapped children.

Using the Typology Model of Adjustment and Adaptation, a family stress model, the differences in family stressors, resources, family types, parental coping patterns, and child health indices were examined in 27 single-parent families and 27 two-parent families who had a child with cerebral palsy. The two groups of families were matched on the severity of the child's handicap and the age and gender of the parent. There was no significant difference between the two groups of families on the accumulation of stressors and demands, resource strains, family types, family cohesion, family resources of esteem/communication, mastery/health, extended family social support, and the child health indices of overall physical health status and health improvement. Single-parent families were significantly lower on financial well-being and the mother's coping related to maintaining family integration, cooperation, and optimism about the situation. Single-parent families also were higher on family adaptability than two-parent families, reflecting an ability to be more flexible in family rules, power structure, and role relationships.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

Family environment in families with versus families without parental bipolar disorder: a preliminary comparison study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare family environmental characteristics of families with at least one bipolar parent and families with parents without any Axis I disorder. METHODS: Family environment of 24 families with at least one parent with bipolar disorder (BPD) and 27 families with healthy parents (healthy families, HF) were assessed using the Family Environment Scale (FES). We compared FES subscale scores between BPD and HF. We also compared FES normative scores with scores of BPD families. RESULTS: Seventeen (71%) of the 24 BPD families had at least one child with a mood disorder and one (3.7%) of the 27 HF had a child with a mood disorder. Families with BPD reported lower cohesion (p = 0.009) and expressiveness (p = 0.03) scores compared with HF, after controlling for group socioeconomic status differences. Bilineal BPD families had higher cohesion scores than unilineal BPD families (p = 0.05). We found no significant differences in any subscales between BPD families with (n = 9) versus without (n = 15) children with BPD. Compared with normative FES data BPD families reported lower cohesion (C) (p = 0.02) and independence (IND) (p = 0.004) scores and higher conflict (CON) (p = 0.02), intellectual-cultural orientation (ICO) (p = 0.05), moral-religious emphasis (MRE) (p < 0.001) and control (CTL) (p < 0.001) scores. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that members of BPD families may have difficulty communicating effectively with one another, suggesting that interventions aimed at improving this may be beneficial to patients with BPD. Results suggest that the impact of different lifestyles in different communities may influence FES scores, and thus it is important to use demographically matched comparison groups.

Bipolar Disorder↗

[Analysis of the concept of family nursing. Family systems nursing and family-centered nursing as closely related concepts].

The article analyses the concept of family nursing, which is defined and described by reference to its key characteristics (e.g. Rodgers 1989, Meleis 1991). Other, closely related and to some extent even substitutable concepts identified in the article are family systems nursing and family-centered nursing. The broad area of family therapy is excluded from the discussion since the purpose is to concentrate on the nursing of healthy families. Family nursing is defined in three different ways depending on the place and the role of the family on practical nursing: family as a context, as a sum of its parts and as a client. Concept of family-centered nursing is included in these three levels, but also levels minimal emphasis on family and family therapy, which are not included in the concept of family nursing. However, it is concluded that the two concepts can be regarded as closely related. Family systems nursing can be regarded either as one sub-concept to family nursing and family-centered nursing or as a kindred concept. It is suggested that a serious debate should be started in Finland on these concepts and that research should be undertaken in different nursing situations to find out how these concepts occur in reality.

Family↗

A longitudinal, national study of the effect of implementing a required third-year family practice clerkship or a department of family medicine on the selection of family medicine by medical students.

PURPOSE: To conduct a longitudinal study of the effect of implementing a required third-year family practice clerkship or a department of family medicine on the proportion of graduating medical students choosing family practice as a specialty. METHOD: Using national data sets, the authors studied the proportion of students who chose family practice as a specialty at each medical school that implemented a required third-year family practice clerkship or a department of family medicine between 1984 and 1993. They compared the mean proportions of students choosing family practice for the three years before and three years after implementation of the required clerkship or the department. They controlled for national trends by comparing study schools with schools that did not have required family practice clerkships. RESULTS: The mean proportions of students who chose family practice increased 2.36% above control schools (95% CI = 1.06, 3.65) in public schools and 2.07% (95% CI = -2.58, 6.73) in private schools after a required third-year clerkship was implemented. The proportion of students choosing family practice declined by 0.84% (95% CI = -4.05, 2.47) after a department of family medicine was established. CONCLUSION: Implementing a required third-year family practice clerkship led to an immediate, significant increase in the proportion of students choosing family practice. Implementing a department of family medicine had no noticeable effect on the proportion of students choosing family practice in the first three years after implementation.

Career Choice↗

The value of screening and central registration of families with familial adenomatous polyposis. A study of 82 families in The Netherlands.

In 1984 a national registry of families with familial adenomatous polyposis was set up in The Netherlands to promote screening in those families. Eight-two families had been registered by the end of 1988. Analysis of the pedigrees showed that 204 family members at risk had not yet been screened. The diagnosis of familial adenomatous polyposis was histologically confirmed in 230 patients. These patients were subdivided into two groups. Group A comprised patients with familial adenomatous polyposis referred because they were symptomatic, and Group B relatives of these patients who were found by screening to have familial adenomatous polyposis. The authors compared these groups with respect to the occurrence of colorectal carcinoma. Fifty-four patients were found to have a colorectal carcinoma at the time of diagnosis of familial adenomatous polyposis, i.e., 49 of the 104 patients in Group A (47 percent) and five of the 126 patients in Group B (4 percent). The average age at diagnosis of the 104 patients in Group A was 35 years (range, 13 to 66 years) and that of the 126 patients in Group B was 24 years (range, 8 to 59 years). By the age of 40 years, 90 percent of the patients in group B had been diagnosed. Late onset of familial adenomatous polyposis was found in four families. Endoscopy and/or radiography of the upper digestive tract were (was) performed in 44 of the 230 patients. Nineteen patients (43 percent) were found to have polyps in the stomach or duodenum, or both. In our series, only one patient died from cancer of the upper digestive tract (ampullary carcinoma). These results show conclusively that screening leads to the early detection of familial adenomatous polyposis. The value of a national registry is proved by the finding of many at-risk family members who had not previously been screened. Screening should start between the ages of 10 and 12 and should continue up to the age of 50. In the rare cases of families with an apparently late onset of familial adenomatous polyposis, screening should be continued up to age 60. More studies are needed to determine the natural history of polyps in the upper digestive tract.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗

Hawaii's healthy start program of home visiting for at-risk families: evaluation of family identification, family engagement, and service delivery.

OBJECTIVE: To describe family identification, family engagement, and service delivery in a statewide home visiting program for at-risk families of newborns. SETTING: Six target communities of Hawaii's Healthy Start Program (HSP), which incorporates 1) early identification of at-risk families of newborns via population-based screening and assessment, and 2) paraprofessional home visiting to improve family functioning, promote child health and development, and prevent child maltreatment. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study: describes early identification process and family characteristics associated with initial enrollment. Longitudinal study: describes home visiting process and characteristics associated with continued participation. SUBJECTS: Cross-sectional study: civilian births in 6 communities (n = 6553). Longitudinal study: at-risk families in the intervention group of a randomized trial of the HSP (n = 373). MEASURES PROCESS: completeness and timeliness of early identification and home visiting activities; family characteristics: sociodemographics, child abuse risk factors, infant biologic risk. RESULTS: Early identification staff determined risk status for 84% of target families. Families with higher risk scores, young mothers with limited schooling, and families with infants at biologic risk were more likely to enroll in home visiting. Half of those who enrolled were active at 1 year with an average of 22 visits. Families where the father had multiple risk factors and where the mother was substance abusing were more likely to have >/=12 visits; mothers who were unilaterally violent toward the father were less likely. Most families were linked with a medical home; linkage rates for other community resources varied widely by type of service. Half of families overall, but >/=80% of those active at 1 year, received core home visiting services. Performance varied by program site. CONCLUSIONS: It is challenging to engage and retain at-risk families in home visiting. Service monitoring must be an integral part of operations.

Child↗

Family members' perceptions of palliative cancer care: predictors of family functioning and family members' health.

We studied family members' care experiences during the palliative care phase as predictors of family members' health and family functioning during the palliative care phase and three months following the death of the patient. Eighty family members of advanced cancer patients participated in the study at time one (T1) (palliative care phase) and 64 family members completed the data collection protocol at time two (T2) (three months bereavement). Data were also obtained from 36 of the patients within one month of their deaths. Fulfillment theory accounted for 31% of the variance in family care satisfaction and Discrepancy theory accounted for 72% of the variance in family care satisfaction. Discrepancy theory predicted family functioning in the bereavement period (r = -0.33, p < 0.05). Patients' quality of life scores were moderately correlated with family members' health during the palliative care phase (r = -0.38, p < 0.05). Family members' scores on the health index (symptom of stress scale) were significantly lower (p < 0.05) than normative scores reported in a study using a healthy population. The strongest predictor of family members' health scores in the bereavement period was their health score at T1 (r = 0.71, p < 0.01). As well, family functioning at T1 was strongly correlated with family functioning at T2.

Adolescent↗