Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 336978

[Graphical methods in data analysis (author's transl)].

Abstract

Data analysis is concerned with attentive description and communication of the information contents of a body of data. Background information, conceptual insight and especially graphical methods play a key role in data analysis for developing a feeling for the data both by formal procedures to be applied in the light of specified models and even more by informal inference or methods that are suggestive and conctructive. This paper reviews graphical methods useful for description, screening, analysis, cross-examining, selection, reduction, presentation and summary of data: for uncovering distributional peculiarities and understanding the structure underlying experimental and survey data. Moreover scatter plots, probability plots and residual plots provide insight into the possible inappropriateness of certain assumptions of the statistical model. Some techniques are illustrated by examples: four-dimensional data may be reprented as scatter plot on ordinary graph paper by using a combination of 2 different sets of symbols for at most 7 different levels of the third variable (formula: see text) and of the fourth variable (formula: see text). Comments on the use of tables and graphical methods, a small overview of the latter and of the scope of applications endeavour to pave the way such that structures may be better understandable and unanticipated characteristics may be spotted.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L Sachs. 1977-10-15. [Graphical methods in data analysis (author's transl)].. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01488184

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The spectral analysis of hypnotic performance with respect to "absorption".

In factor analyses of the hypnosis scales, the essential result is that the items form a continuous, 2-dimensional fan-shaped pattern. This continuum is referred to as the "spectrum of hypnotic performance." "Special analysis" is introduced as an exploratory procedure which makes use of this notion of continuum or spectrum. Spectral analysis consists of a graphical display of the level of latent correlation between a variable and individual hypnotic performances when the latter are arranged according to their position in the spectrum. The spectral analysis of hypnotic performance with respect to absorption is illustrated using data from a sample of 160 Ss. The results indicate that absorption is more strongly related to difficult hypnotic performances than to easy ones. In particular, illustrative item characteristic curves are presented to show that although easy hypnotic performances do not require the processes tapped by individual differences in absorption, a certain level of absorption is necessary to pass difficult hypnotic items. In addition, a high level of absorption may be sufficient in and of itself for difficult hypnotic performances. These results are discussed in light of some speculations by Shor, M. T. Orne, and O'Connell (1962) and Tellegen (1978/1979) concerning the differential contribution of ability components to performance on difficult hypnotic suggestions. The results are also related to a variety of work in social psychological models of hypnotic performance.

Factor Analysis, Statistical

Implicit personality theory and the five-factor model.

The Big Five have not only been identified in ratings of knowledgeable informants, but also in ratings of strangers, in co-occurrence likelihood ratings of traits, in semantic similarity ratings of trait pairs, and in prototypicality ratings of acts for traits. This article describes the shared and distinctive characteristics of correlations among trait ratings and implicit personality theory and reviews studies that compare the structure of memory-based ratings and of on-line behavior counts. Three hypotheses suggested in the literature to account for these correlations are delineated and discussed: an accurate reflection hypothesis, a distortion hypothesis, and an overlap hypothesis. It is concluded that the distortion hypothesis, has been discredited and that an overlap model best accounts for the available evidence. This implies that traits are real and accurately perceived, provided that the judges have the necessary information.

Factor Analysis, Statistical