PubMed · 3303665
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
F C Volkmann. 1986. Human visual suppression.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(86)90164-1
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
This technique was designed to establish a simple, objective evaluation system for facial paralysis through the use of a personal computer. A total of 24 marks were placed on the faces of subjects for the following procedures. Movements of the face were photographed with a video-camera and fed continuously into the computer. Ten frames per movement representing facial movement from rest to maximum movement were selected for analysis. By means of a digital image-processing technique, only the marks placed on the face were extracted, and the movement of these marks was quantitatively analyzed. A total of 44 healthy subjects with no history of facial paralysis were used as a normal control group. The patients with facial paralysis consisted of nine subjects with Bell's palsy and three with Ramsay Hunt syndrome. In the eye-closing motions, no significant differences were found between the sum of the movement distances on the left and right sides in each normal subject. However, the patients with facial paralysis showed distinct differences from those obtained in the normal subjects. The improvement process was also evaluated with a ratio of affected- and normal-side facial movements.
BACKGROUND: The somatosensory evoked blink response (SBR) is a characteristic reflex blink elicited by electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves or other anatomical sites. METHODS: 139 patients with neurological disorders were examined for presence of the SBR. Although the SBR was not usually elicitable, it was present in a subset of patients with Parkinson's disease and with hemifacial spasm. It was also present in a patient with Guillain-Barré syndrome before the recovery phase. The latency of the EMG activities responsible for the SBR was significantly shorter than that of the startle blink. CONCLUSIONS: The SBR is not a variant of the startle blink, but is a release phenomenon transmitted via the brainstem reticular formation. This response may be clinically relevant in disorders associated with brainstem lesions and abnormal blinking.