Tinnitus--the initial evaluation.

D E Mattox; W J Richtsmeier

doi:10.1177/019459988709600210

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 3120092

Tinnitus--the initial evaluation.

D E Mattox·W J Richtsmeier

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Initial evaluation of patients with tinnitus presents a challenge to the otolaryngologist's skills, knowledge, and judgment. History-taking, physical examination, and the ordering of initial laboratory tests should be orchestrated to efficiently evaluate patients with tinnitus. By the end of this initial evaluation, major decisions have to be made in regard to the employment of additional expensive and possibly invasive diagnostic tests. We present an outline to expedite the initial evaluation of patients with tinnitus as their major concern.

Explore related subjects

Audiometry Humans Medical History Taking Physical Examination Radiography Tinnitus Journal Article Review

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

D E Mattox, W J Richtsmeier. 1987. Tinnitus--the initial evaluation.. https://doi.org/10.1177/019459988709600210

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2001

Is there a functioning vestibulocochlear nerve? Cochlear implantation in a child with symmetrical auditory findings but asymmetric imaging.

The finding of an abnormally narrow internal auditory meatus during the assessment of a child for cochlear implantation raises the possibility that the meatus may not contain the normal number of nerves. Even with currently available MRI techniques it may be extremely difficult to decide whether or not to offer cochlear implant in such cases. We present a child of 4 1/2 years, assessed for cochlear implantation. MRI and CT imaging suggested aplasia of one vestibulocochlear nerve and hypoplasia of the other. However, audiological tests showed clear responses to sound in both ears and functional use of sound in her daily life. This child was eventually implanted with encouraging postoperative results.

Audiometry↗

PubMed2001

Audiometric notch as a sign of noise induced hearing loss.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relation between different types of exposure to noise and a classic sign of noise induced hearing loss (NIHL), the audiometric notch. METHODS: The study sample had exposure to both continuous and impulse noise and was drawn from a population of electrical transmission workers. Audiograms, taken as part of a hearing conservation programme, were read by three clinicians experienced in the assessment of NIHL. Working independently and using their clinical judgment, they were asked to identify localised increases in the threshold of hearing (audiometric notches) which they would attribute to noise, had a suitable history of exposure been elicited. Prevalent cases of NIHL were identified by the presence of a notch in either ear. Risk factors for NIHL were assessed by a questionnaire which sought information about exposure to air blast circuit breaker noise; firearms; explosions, and continuous noise. The odds of exposure to these factors in those with and without hearing loss were calculated, and odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were estimated by logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 648 questionnaires sent out 357 were returned, a response rate of 55%. Of these, at least two out of the three assessors identified 175 (49%) people with a notch at any audiometric frequency. There was no association between these cases and the NIHL risk factors identified by the questionnaire, but a further frequency specific analysis showed a small proportion of people (15 (4%)) with notches at 4 kHz who had the expected associations with exposure to noise and a significant OR for firearms of 4.25 (95% CI 1.28 to 14.1). The much larger proportion of people with 6 kHz notches (110 (31%)) did not show these associations. CONCLUSIONS: To diagnose NIHL it is important to elicit a detailed and accurate history of exposure to noise: although the notch at 4 kHz is a well established clinical sign and may be valuable in confirming the diagnosis, the 6 kHz notch is variable and of limited importance.

Audiometry↗

PubMed2000

Use of the auditory brainstem response testing in the clinical evaluation of the patients with diabetes mellitus.

The objective of the study was to assess whether a relationship exists between the auditory brain stem response (ABR) results and diabetes mellitus with and without complications. In the clinical and audiometry laboratory settings, diabetic patients with and without complications (retinopathy and/or nephropathy) were examined using ABR testing, and the results were interpreted for their applicability in clinical practice. Fifty-nine patients with diabetic retinopathy or nephropathy (study group) and 20 diabetic patients without any known diabetic complication (control group) were assessed with audiometry and ABR testing. ABR revealed that the absolute latencies and interwave intervals of the waves I through V were prolonged significantly in the study group when compared to the control group. The amplitudes of waves I through V were diminished in the study group when compared to the control group, but a statistical significance was present only for wave V amplitude. Quantitative (wave I to wave V amplitude ratio) and qualitative analyses of the ABR waves showed abnormal waveforms in the study and control groups by 55.2 and 27.6%, respectively. There is a brain stem neuropathy in diabetes mellitus which can be assessed with ABR testing. The likelihood of encountering a diabetic complication increases as the ABR results become abnormal.

Audiometry↗