Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 2932964

[Anesthesiological support for technically complex cesarean section operations].

L E Manevich·V I Kulakov·S G Kokhnover·L S Mareeva·A A Kolometskaia
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Anesthesia, EpiduralAnesthesia, GeneralAnesthesia, ObstetricalCesarean SectionElectrocardiographyFemaleHemodynamicsHumansIntraoperative CarePreanesthetic MedicationPregnancyTime FactorsComparative StudyEnglish AbstractJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L E Manevich, V I Kulakov, S G Kokhnover, L S Mareeva, A A Kolometskaia. 1985. [Anesthesiological support for technically complex cesarean section operations].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2932964/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1992

[Regional anesthesia in emergency cesarean section. Quality of epidural and spinal anesthesia].

From 1987 to 1989, 97.8% of non-elective caesarean sections at Innherred general hospital were performed under regional anaesthesia (N = 271). A retrospective analysis showed that the mean time from giving the anaesthetic until start of surgery was 28.1 min. with epidural anaesthesia and 12.7 min. with spinal anaesthesia. Mean time was 25.9 and 9.3 min. respectively in cases of suspected asphyxia. In eight women primary anesthesia was unsuccessful; six received further spinal anaesthesia and two general anaesthesia. Regional anaesthesia is considered safe for the purpose, but in cases of serious asphyxia there is some controversy as to whether spinal or general anaesthesia is to be preferred.

Anesthesia, Epidural↗