Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 2648869

Reflections on creativity and madness.

A M Ludwig
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The author reflects on the long-assumed relationship between creativity and madness. He comes to the conclusion that, while not a prerequisite, a touch of madness could enhance creativity. He attempts to define creativity and breaks it down into the basic elements of creative person, creative process, and creative product. He touches on the influence of a particular culture on the emergence of creative works.

Explore related subjects

CreativityHumansMental DisordersJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A M Ludwig. 1989. Reflections on creativity and madness.. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1989.43.1.4

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

An exploration of the patient's experience of electro-convulsive therapy in mid-twentieth century creative literature: a historical study with implications for practice today.

BACKGROUND: Understanding a patient's subjective experience of electro-convulsive therapy (ECT) is important. Creative literature may both express such experiences and influence how ECT is perceived since scenarios and characters in literature become incorporated into cultural stereotypes and mythologies. Clinical discussions with patients and their families suggest that One Flew over the Cuckoo's Nest still has an impact on their perceptions of ECT, and therefore still has clinical relevance today. This study aims to explore experiences of ECT through creative literature focussing on novels from the 1960s. METHOD: Study of three novels depicting ECT in their historical context. RESULTS: Various factors identified in the books studied may be associated with reluctance to accept ECT as a treatment, in particular images related to electricity. LIMITATIONS: Since this is a historical survey rather than a clinical research project, and is based on creative literature, it may not reflect 21st century reality. CONCLUSIONS: Fear of electricity and other factors in the practice of ECT in the past may still be important in the acceptance of ECT as a clinical treatment. This warrants further qualitative exploration.

Creativity↗