Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 261658

Language: perspectives from another modality.

Abstract

Human languages have been forged in auditory-vocal channels throughout evolution. This paper examines the formal properties of a communication system that has developed in the absence of speech: the sign language of the deaf. The objective is to investigate to what extent the overall form and organization of language is determined by the articulatory and perceptual modality in which it has developed (its transmission system) and to what extent its form and organization represent more fundamental aspects of the human mind (intellect). Experimental and linguistic evidence is brought to bear on the analysis of the sign: studies of coding and processing of signs in memory; of slips of the hand; of historical change in signs over time; the heightened use of language in poetry and wit. American Sign Language differs dramatically from English and other spoken languages in the mechanisms by which its lexical units are modified. For the form of its morphological processes, the mode in which the language develops appears to make a crucial difference. Finally, the issue of cerebral specialization with respect to a visual-manual language is addressed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

U Bellugi, E S Klima. 1979. Language: perspectives from another modality.. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470720523.ch6

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Speech activation SPECT measurements in the determination of hemispheric dominance].

Cognitive activity leads to an increased regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) and energy metabolism in both cerebral hemispheres. In order to assess the reliability of rCBF-SPECT measurements in hemispheric dominance (Broca's area) speech activation SPECT studies were performed in nine patients. Patients (men, n = 6; women, n = 3, mean age: 33.8 +/- 13.8 years) with diagnosis of epilepsy (n = 7) and AVM (n = 2) participated in the preoperative study. Two SPECT studies were performed in each case, one in rest, and one during speech activation. 740 MBq of 99mTc-HMPAO/ECD was injected and stereo TCD monitoring was performed during the three minutes of speech activation. The acquisition was performed by a dual-head ADAC Solus Epic Atlas SPECT camera (ADAC Laboratories, Milpitas, USA). RCBF SPECT measurements were analyzed visually and by a special region-of-interest (ROI) program. The hemispheric dominance profiles were established on the basis of the respective blood flow velocity values obtained by fTCD and cortical hyperperfusion measured by SPECT. The neuropsychological test battery, used in the present study, was developed in our institute. The results of rCBF-SPECT studies highly correlated with the lateralization of hemispheric dominance measured by fTCD. There was a significant increase of rCBF in the inferior posterior frontal cortex (Broca's area, p < 0.0003). The non-invasive speech activation rCBF-SPECT measurement is a highly reliable and useful method in the determination of hemispheric dominance. SPECT studies are especially useful in cases where the performance of fTCD measurements are impossible due to the lack of temporal bone window or occlusive cerebral arterial disease.

Dominance, Cerebral↗

Does Gustave Dax deserve to be forgotten? The temporal lobe theory and other contributions of an overlooked figure in the history of language and cerebral dominance.

Gustave Dax played an important role in the early history of cerebral dominance for language. He not only sent the 1836 memoir of Marc Dax, his deceased father, to Paris in 1863, but saw to it that this important document was published before Paul Broca's own article on cerebral dominance appeared later in 1865. In addition, he supported his father's contention that the left hemisphere is special for speech with 140 additional clinical cases. Gustave Dax's own unique contribution, however, has been almost completely overlooked. Although his theory lacked specificity, he preceded Meynert, Schmidt, and Wernicke in suggesting that the left temporal lobe may be especially important for speech.

Dominance, Cerebral↗