Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 2575861

[Data processing in trauma surgery. Experiences with the optical mark reader assisted data processing system Askitron MTF].

J Windolf·R Inglis·J M Rueger·A Pannike
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Complications of recently used coding systems, error sensitivity and limited reliability of results of data in daily use still do not match with the benefit of data processing in trauma surgery. The relevant advantages of an optical mark reader based data processing system are presented.

Explore related subjects

Electronic Data ProcessingHumansMedical RecordsMedical Records, Problem-OrientedMicrocomputersSoftwareWounds and InjuriesJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Windolf, R Inglis, J M Rueger, A Pannike. 1989. [Data processing in trauma surgery. Experiences with the optical mark reader assisted data processing system Askitron MTF].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2575861/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1992

Integration of a barcode reader with a commercial flow cytometer.

This report describes the application and installation of a barcode reader on a standard EPICS Elite flow cytometer. The barcode reader system eliminates keyboard entry of sample information on the cytometer. The system automates the transfer of sample information already present in our laboratory database to the cytometer at run time. The system uses a standard "off-the-shelf" bar code wand with a personal computer keyboard interface and requires no additional software at run time. No typing of sample information is required by the operator at any stage of normal sample operation at the cytometer. All operations are automatically coded into the cytometry software using the macro functions of the software. Tubes are inserted into the tube reader and sample information is transferred automatically into the cytometer. We have found that the system allows rapid and continuous operation of routine clinical and research samples. This automated data entry also reduces the possibility of data input errors.

Electronic Data Processing↗
PubMed1992

Comparison of lymphocyte immunophenotypes obtained simultaneously from two different data acquisition and analysis systems on the same flow cytometer.

Immunophenotyping of different lymphocyte populations was carried out in parallel on 113 consecutively received specimens of human peripheral blood using 2 different data acquisition and analysis systems (EPICS C and 4Cyte-Acmecyte) on the same flow cytometer (EPICS C). The phenotypes analyzed were CD3+, CD4+, CD8+ CD56+ CD16+ CD3-, TCR-gamma delta+ CD8-, and TCR-gamma delta+ CD8+. Both HIV- and HIV+ specimens were used for this study, including some with CD4 levels as low as 2% of all lymphocytes. Despite differences in gating procedures and shapes of bitmap (rectilinear vs. "amorphous"), the 2 methods agreed to within 2% positive cells in 97% of the cases. Although some statistically significant biases in the methods were observed, these were small and not biologically important. We conclude that both methods of data acquisition and analysis, as employed by experienced operators on the EPICS C flow cytometer, gave essentially equivalent results for lymphocyte sub-populations in peripheral blood preparations.

Electronic Data Processing↗