Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 2541634

Peripheral nerve stimulators.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Beaudoin. 1989. Peripheral nerve stimulators.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2541634/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Kinetic model for the inactivation of Lactobacillus plantarum by pulsed electric fields.

The kinetics of Lactobacillus plantarum inactivation by pulsed electric fields (PEF) was studied in two different growth stages (exponential and stationary), but in the same reference medium (0.6% peptone water). Electric field intensity and treatment time varied from 20 to 28 kV/cm and 30 to 240 micros, respectively. The experimental data showed that cells in the exponential growth stage were more sensitive to PEF treatment than those in the stationary stage. The inactivation data were adjusted to the Bigelow and Hülsheger models and the Weibull frequency distribution function, and constants were calculated for both growth stages in each model. The models were tested and their accuracy was assessed by using the Accuracy Factor. According to this parameter, the Weibull frequency distribution function gave better fittings for the inactivation by PEF than Bigelow or Hülsheger models. On the other hand, the Bigelow model gave a good accuracy factor and is simpler.

Electric Stimulation↗

Modelling and optimization of inactivation of Lactobacillus plantarum by pulsed electric field treatment.

AIMS: The effect of critical pulsed electric field (PEF) process parameters, such as electric field strength, pulse length and number of pulses, on inactivation of Lactobacillus plantarum was investigated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Experiments were performed in a pH 4.5 sodium phosphate buffer having a conductivity of 0.1 S m-1, using a laboratory-scale continuous PEF apparatus with a co-linear treatment chamber. An inactivation model was developed as a function of field strength, pulse length and number of pulses. Based on this inactivation model, the conditions for a PEF treatment were optimized with respect to the minimum energy required to obtain a certain level of inactivation. It was shown that the least efficient process parameter in the range investigated was the number of pulses. The most efficient way to optimize inactivation of Lact. plantarum was to increase the field strength up to 25.7 kV cm-1, at the shortest pulse length investigated, 0.85 micros, and using a minimum number of pulses. The highest inactivation of Lact. plantarum at the lowest energy costs is obtained by using the equation: E=26.7tau0.23, in which E is the field strength and tau the pulse length. An optimum is reached by substituting tau with 5.1. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the correct choice of parameters, as predicted by the model described here, can considerably improve the PEF process. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The knowledge gained in this study improves the understanding of the limitations and opportunities of the PEF process. Consequently, the advantage of the PEF process as a new option for non-thermal decontamination can be better utilized.

Electric Stimulation↗