Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 2498569

[Cofactorial glaucoma--causes].

Abstract

The various types of glaucoma may be classified more accurately by studying the structure and physiology of the trabecular meshwork. Seen in this light, the development of glaucoma is linked to "extrinsic" and "intrinsic" factors. The intrinsic factors represent the predisposition to glaucoma; the secondary factors intervene in a secondary phase, creating a resistance to aqueous humor outflow. In so-called primary glaucoma the predisposition plays a decisive role, while the extrinsic factors are not so important. In cofactorial glaucoma the predisposition is only of slight significance, while the extrinsic factors are extremely important. In true secondary glaucoma predisposition plays a minimal role, while the extrinsic factors are all the more important. In correlated glaucomas the predisposition may be extremely relevant, but the extrinsic factors which represent the key causes are still unknown. Several types of glaucoma are described as examples.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L Scullica. 1989. [Cofactorial glaucoma--causes].. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1046357

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Do scleral flap dimensions influence reliability of intraocular pressure control in experimental trabeculectomy?

AIM: To compare the effect on intraocular pressure (IOP) of large vs small scleral flap size during trabeculectomy using adjustable sutures. METHODS: Trabeculectomy operations were performed on nine donor human eyes connected to a constant flow infusion with real-time IOP monitoring. Large scleral flaps (4 x 4 mm, 16 mm(2), n=12) or small scleral flaps (3 x 2 mm, 6 mm(2), n=9) were constructed over 0.76 mm(2) sclerostomies. For each procedure, equilibrium IOP was measured following tight closure with two four-throw adjustable 10-0 nylon sutures. RESULTS: Five scleral flaps were thin or poorly constructed; four of these were in the initial seven procedures, implying learning effect. These had a mean absolute IOP of 7.6 mmHg (range 2.7-12.4 mmHg) and mean relative IOP of 28.3% of baseline (range 10-45.8%) after closure. In the remaining 16 good quality procedures, mean IOP was 1.3 mmHg (range 0-3.4 mmHg) after sclerostomy, confirming minimal outflow resistance before closure. Following flap closure mean IOP was 20 mmHg (SD 4.4, range 15.5-29.3 mmHg) for large (n=8), and 18.7 mmHg (SD 3.6, 15.9-25.8 mmHg) for small (n=8) flaps (unpaired t-test, P=0.26). Mean IOP (% baseline) was 71.6% (SD 8.4, range 60.6-86.6%) and 66% (SD=12.7, 46.8-86.6%) for large and small flap groups, respectively (unpaired t-test, P=0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Well-constructed scleral flaps of both sizes were able to support an average IOP at least two-thirds of baseline, and both had similar absolute IOP levels. Errors in flap construction resulted in loss of IOP control. Smaller flap size does not appear to compromise control of early postoperative IOP using adjustable sutures.

Glaucoma↗