Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Myopia”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

Biological mechanisms of atropine in myopia control (Review).

Myopia is now recognized as a progressive, potentially sight‑threatening disease rather than just a refractive error, with its prevalence rising rapidly worldwide due to its high occurrence, major vision losses and huge public health cost. The World Health Organization estimates that 2.6 billion individuals in the world were myopic in 2020 this figure is projected to increase to 3.364 billion by 2030. Although myopia may be better controlled in its early stages, it may not be completely reversed at this time. Of all of the methods for controlling myopia, atropine, a muscarinic receptor antagonist, remains an effective pharmacological option for slowing myopia progression in children. However, the mechanisms of action of atropine remain to be fully elucidated. This review provided a systematic review for myopia epidemiology, pathogenesis, the effects and side effects, as well as up‑to‑date possible mechanisms, in the hope of facilitating that researchers in this field elucidate its underlying mechanisms so that clinical ophthalmologists may be able to better control this disease.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

A validated sensitive LC-MS/MS method and its application in elucidating the unique ocular pharmacokinetic profile of 0.01% atropine underpinning its clinical utility for myopia.

A sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was developed and validated to quantify atropine in ten rabbit ocular tissues enabling systematic characterization of the ocular pharmacokinetic profile of 0.01% atropine sulfate eye drops after a single topical administration. The method demonstrated excellent linearity (coefficient of determination, R2&#xa0;&#x2265;&#xa0;0.9908) across all matrices, with lower limits of quantification (LLOQ) of 0.05&#xa0;ng/mL for most tissues and 0.10&#xa0;ng/mL for retina and lens; intra- and inter-day accuracy, precision, matrix effects, extraction recoveries, and stability all met the acceptance criteria. Following a single bilateral topical dose (50&#xa0;&#x3bc;L/eye) in New Zealand White rabbits, atropine distributed rapidly into all 12 ocular compartments (the sclera further divided into three anatomical regions) with marked heterogeneity-the highest exposures were found in conjunctiva and cornea, a distinct anterior-to-posterior concentration gradient was observed in the sclera, sustained retention was noted in the retina (mean residence time from zero to the last measurable time point, MRT0-t 3.30&#xa0;h), while aqueous and vitreous humor eliminated rapidly (elimination half-life, t&#x2081;/&#x2082;&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.7&#xa0;h), and all tissues except aqueous humor followed a two-compartment model. This validated method and the comprehensive pharmacokinetic data reveal that topically applied 0.01% atropine achieves sustained exposure in key myopia-regulating tissues (retina, choroid, posterior sclera) with low exposure in side-effect target tissues (iris, ciliary body, lens).

Animals↗
PubMed2026

Risk Factors and Predictive Model for Postoperative High Myopia in Children Undergoing Congenital Cataract Surgery With Intraocular Lens Implantation.

PURPOSE: To identify risk factors associated with the development of high myopia following congenital cataract surgery and to establish a robust predictive model. DESIGN: Retrospective clinical cohort study. SUBJECTS: This retrospective study included 106 pediatric patients who underwent congenital cataract surgery with primary IOL implantation (mean follow-up 8.19 years). The model was externally validated in an independent cohort of 72 patients with a mean follow-up of 7.83 years. METHODS: Preoperative and postoperative ocular biometric parameters were collected. Risk factors for postoperative high myopia were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression, which served as the basis for model construction. The predictive performance of the model was rigorously evaluated for discrimination and calibration. Discriminative ability was quantified using Harrell's C-index and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Model calibration was assessed via calibration plots by comparing predicted probabilities with actual observed outcomes. Internal validation was performed using a bootstrapping method (500 iterations) to ensure model stability and adjust for potential overfitting. RESULTS: An initial postoperative refraction of <+0.75D, and a higher IOL Power to Axial length Ratio (IOL/AL ratio) were identified as significant risk factors for the development of postoperative high myopia. Shorter preoperative axial length was associated with a greater magnitude of postoperative myopic shift. The predictive model demonstrated robust performance, achieving a C-index of 0.711 (internal validation C-index: 0.713). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values for predicting high myopia at 5 and 10 years were 0.858 and 0.745, respectively. Furthermore, calibration curves demonstrated excellent agreement between the predicted and observed outcomes throughout the follow-up period. In external validation, the model achieved a C-index of 0.825, 5-year AUC of 0.833, and 10-year AUC of 0.713. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis established that initial postoperative refraction <+0.75D, and an elevated IOL/AL ratio are key determinants of high myopia risk following surgery. Shorter preoperative axial length was associated with a greater magnitude of postoperative myopic shift. This predictive framework provides clinicians with a practical tool to optimize preoperative IOL selection and identify high-risk infants who require vigilant myopia prevention and balanced amblyopia management.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Differences in circadian rhythm changes between myopic and non-myopic college students over 2&#x2009;years.

This study aimed to characterize and compare the differences in circadian rhythm changes during 2&#x2009;years between college students with myopia and non-myopia based on a longitudinal cohort study. Wake-up time and bedtime were obtained through a self-administered questionnaire. Chronotype was assessed using the reduced Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (rMEQ). Circadian rhythm timing was determined by dim-light melatonin onset (DLMO), measured through hourly saliva collection from 21:00 to 01:00. A total of 450 college students (146 [32.4%] males) with a mean age of 18.65&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;1.05&#x2009;years were included, of whom 353 (78.4%) students had myopia. Compared with non-myopic individuals, myopic students slept later, woke up earlier, and exhibited lower rMEQ scores at baseline. Over the 2-year follow-up, both groups showed significantly earlier bedtimes, later wake-up times, and higher rMEQ scores. Only myopic students demonstrated a 45-minute delay in DLMO after the 2-year follow-up. After adjusting for potential confounders, linear mixed-effects models showed that myopic individuals had later bedtimes and earlier wake-up times. These findings indicate significant circadian rhythm changes in individuals with myopia, suggesting the potential of targeted sleep rhythm interventions on preventing myopia.

Myopia↗
PubMed2026

Efficacy, tolerability, and threshold effect of atropine eye drops for myopia control: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.

Atropine is an emerging therapy for myopia, yet the optimal concentration for prescription remains uncertain. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov registry platforms. We included the randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compared any dose of atropine against a placebo in myopic children. Among 3566 studies assessed, we identified 33 eligible RCTs involving 6301 children aged 4-18 years, with 10 different concentrations and a mean follow-up time of 19.5&#x202f;&#xb1;&#x202f;12.3 months. A nonlinear relationship was observed between atropine dosage and treatment efficacy (P&#x202f;<&#x202f;0.001). Compared to placebo groups, the mean differences in reducing annual spherical equivalent refraction progression for atropine concentrations of 0.01%, 0.02%, 0.03%, 0.04%, and 0.05% were 0.21 diopters (D) (95% CI, 0.13-0.28), 0.35 D (95% CI, 0.23-0.46), 0.42 D (95% CI, 0.28-0.56), 0.45 D (95% CI, 0.30-0.60), and 0.46 D (95% CI, 0.32-0.61) respectively For higher concentrations, the estimates were 0.49 D (95% CI, 0.34-0.63) for 0.1% and 0.99 D (95% CI, 0.66-1.31) for 1%, although these were based on fewer and smaller trials. Higher doses of atropine were associated with decreased amplitude of accommodation (P&#x202f;=&#x202f;0.02), increased pupil diameters (P&#x202f;=&#x202f;0.01) and a higher frequency of photophobia (P&#x202f;=&#x202f;0.02). Our findings suggest that the increase in treatment efficacy with higher concentrations may plateau beyond a certain range, and that the current practice of increasing atropine concentrations for children who show inadequate responses to lower doses should be confined to a specific concentration range. This analysis is limited by the number, design heterogeneity, and sample sizes of available trials for higher concentrations, and by the frequent lack of pre-intervention refractive history in included studies. Therefore, estimates-particularly for doses exceeding 0.1%-should be interpreted with caution.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Astigmatic vector outcomes after FS-LASIK versus SMILE for high myopic astigmatism: a single-center retrospective comparative cohort study without cyclotorsion compensation.

PURPOSE: To compare astigmatic correction vector outcomes between femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE, also termed Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction, KLEx) without intraoperative cyclotorsion compensation in patients with high myopic astigmatism (-&#x2009;2.00 to&#x2009;-&#x2009;3.75 D), and to clarify procedure-specific correction tendencies under this non-standardized alignment protocol. METHODS: This single-center retrospective comparative cohort study enrolled 155 eyes (one eye randomly selected per patient) that underwent FS-LASIK (80 eyes) or SMILE/KLEx (75 eyes) for high myopic astigmatism correction from January 2023 to July 2024 in Beijing Fenglian Jiayue Lige Clinic. Intraoperative cyclotorsion compensation was intentionally disabled to isolate inherent procedural astigmatism correction characteristics. Standardized Alpins vectorial analysis was performed at 3&#xa0;months and 12&#xa0;months postoperatively. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: 12-month Alpins correction index (CI). Multivariable propensity score adjustment was applied to mitigate confounding by clinical treatment selection bias. Statistical multiplicity control was implemented for secondary vector and visual outcomes. RESULTS: Baseline demographic, refractive, corneal and ocular biometric parameters were balanced between groups after propensity matching. No statistically significant intergroup differences were detected in uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), residual cylinder, safety index or efficacy index at 3 and 12&#xa0;months (all P&#x2009;>&#x2009;0.05). Under the non-cyclotorsion-compensated protocol, significant intergroup differences were identified in the magnitude of surgically induced astigmatism (SIA), correction index (CI), and magnitude error (ME) at both follow-up timepoints (all P&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.0001). Target induced astigmatism (TIA), difference vector (DV), index of success (IOS), and angle error (AE) magnitudes were comparable between groups (all P&#x2009;>&#x2009;0.05). The vector mean axis of DV differed significantly between groups at 3 and 12&#xa0;months (Watson-Williams circular test, all P&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.0001). No reoperations were documented in clinic medical records for either cohort. No standardized dry eye questionnaires, tear film testing or corneal nerve density metrics were collected to quantify dry eye adverse events; only unstructured clinical notes were reviewed for complication screening. CONCLUSIONS: Under surgical alignment without cyclotorsion compensation, FS-LASIK and SMILE/KLEx both yielded acceptable visual and refractive safety/efficacy for high myopic astigmatism (-&#x2009;2.00 to&#x2009;-&#x2009;3.75 D) at 1-year follow-up, but demonstrated divergent astigmatism correction tendencies: FS-LASIK exhibited relative astigmatism overcorrection (vector mean DV:&#x2009;-&#x2009;0.35&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;0.43 D&#x2009;&#xd7;&#x2009;91&#xb0;, CI&#x2009;>&#x2009;1), while SMILE/KLEx showed relative undercorrection (vector mean DV:&#x2009;-&#x2009;0.21&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;0.53 D&#x2009;&#xd7;&#x2009;12&#xb0;, CI&#x2009;<&#x2009;1). These correction biases are specific to the study's manual limbal alignment protocol without cyclotorsion tracking and cannot be generalized to modern optimized surgical platforms equipped with automated cyclotorsion compensation. Residual refractive errors across both groups are likely multifactorial, including differential corneal stromal healing responses, divergent femtosecond/excimer laser tissue modification mechanisms, and uncorrected intraoperative ocular cyclotorsion.

Humans↗