Not always!

CONTEXT: A family history of certain cancers is associated with an increased risk of developing cancer. Both cancer screening and genetic services referral decisions are often based on self-reported pedigree information. OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of self-reported family cancer history information. DATA SOURCES: English-language articles were retrieved by searching MEDLINE (1966-June 2004) using Medical Subject Headings family, genetic predisposition to disease, medical history taking, neoplasm, and reproducibility of results. Additional articles were identified through bibliography searches. STUDY SELECTION: Original studies in which investigators validated self-reported family history by reviewing the identified relatives' medical records, death certificate, or cancer registry information were included, as well as studies that evaluated breast, colon, ovarian, endometrial, and prostate cancers. DATA EXTRACTION: Two of the 3 investigators independently reviewed and abstracted data for estimating the likelihood ratios (LRs) of self-reported family cancer history information. Only data from studies that evaluated both positive and negative family cancer histories were included within the analyses. A total of 14 studies met the search criteria and were included in the review. DATA SYNTHESIS: For patients without a personal history of cancer, the positive and negative LRs of a family history of the following cancers in a first-degree relative were 23.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.4-81.0) and 0.25 (95% CI, 0.10-0.63) for colon cancer; 8.9 (95% CI, 5.4-15.0) and 0.20 (95% CI, 0.08-0.49) for breast cancer; 14.0 (95% CI, 2.2-83.4) and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.31-1.52) for endometrial cancer; 34.0 (95% CI, 5.7-202.0) and 0.51 (95% CI, 0.13-2.10) for ovarian cancer; and 12.3 (95% CI, 6.5-24.0) and 0.32 (95% CI, 0.18-0.55) for prostate cancer, respectively. Positive predictive values tended to be better in articles concerning first-degree relatives compared with second-degree relatives. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported family cancer histories for first-degree relatives are accurate and valuable for breast and colon cancer risk assessments. Negative family history reports for ovarian and endometrial cancers are less useful, although the prevalence of these malignancies within families is low.

Family↗

PubMed2004

The search for low-penetrance cancer susceptibility alleles.

Much of the familial aggregation of common cancer results from inherited susceptibility, but highly penetrant mutations in known genes cannot account for most of the excess. Some of the unexplained familial risk is presumably due to high-penetrance mutations in as yet unidentified genes, but polygenic mechanisms are likely to account for a greater proportion, particularly in breast cancer. This inference, coupled with technological developments, has led to a renaissance in association studies. Most such studies have evaluated small numbers of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a few candidate genes, but reliable high-density oligonucleotide arrays and other novel techniques will allow genome-wide allelic association studies to be conducted. High-density genome-wide SNP analysis will include targets identified by structural considerations, as well as the growing list of candidate genes. In the longer term, high-throughput re-sequencing will be required to identify the rare pathogenic variants that may constitute the majority of low-penetrance alleles. The detection of low-penetrance cancer susceptibility genes will then be restricted mainly by the availability of large numbers of well-characterized cases and controls. Cancer patients with affected relatives are considerably more informative than unselected cases for such studies.

Family↗