Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 2053980

Epidural technique.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Allam. 1991. Epidural technique.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2053980/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Use of propofol-isoflurane as an anesthetic regimen for cesarean section in dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate use of propofol-isoflurane as an anesthetic regimen for cesarean section in dogs and to compare this protocol with epidural analgesia and anesthesia induced with thiopental sodium. DESIGN: Prospective study. ANIMALS: 141 bitches admitted for cesarean section. PROCEDURE: General anesthesia was induced with propofol in 141 dogs undergoing cesarean section. After intubation, anesthesia was maintained by means of inhalation of isoflurane (0.5 to 2.0%), administered in a 65:35 mixture of oxygen:nitrous oxide. After induction, 20 minutes were allowed to elapse before delivery of puppies was begun. Viability of neonates was ascertained immediately after surgery. Owners were interviewed by telephone to determine survival of puppies during the postoperative period. Survival rates from this study were compared with those from cesarean section performed on dogs under epidural analgesia or under general anesthesia induced with thiopental sodium. RESULTS: Induction, maintenance, and recovery were problem free in all bitches. Of 412 puppies delivered by cesarean section, 293 (71%) survived, 13 (3%) were born alive but died within 20 minutes of delivery, and 106 (26%) were stillborn. Survival rate for puppies from dams induced with propofol-isoflurane was similar to that for puppies from dams receiving epidural analgesia. Survival rate for puppies delivered by cesarean section performed on dams under general anesthesia was higher for dams induced with propofol than for dams induced with thiopental sodium. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: General anesthesia induced with propofol and maintained with isoflurane is acceptable for performing cesarean section in dogs.

Anesthesia, Epidural

Reduction of blood loss during spinal surgery by epidural blockade under normotensive general anesthesia.

STUDY DESIGN: This study consisted of a comparison of intraoperative blood loss during posterior spins surgery under normotensive general anesthesia with and without epidural blockade, and a hemodynamic study after epidural injection. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of epidural blockade in reducing blood loss and intraosseous pressure in the vertebral body. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Epidural anesthesia is effective in reducing surgical bleeding. This effect has been thought to be due to systemic arterial hypotension. There was no report on its effect on venous pressure or intraosseous pressure. METHODS: In comparison of blood loss epidural blockade was achieved by preincisional caudal epidural injection of 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine during cervical laminoplasty or posterior lumbar interbody fusion. For each surgical procedure, there were 20 patients who received epidural blockade and 20 who did not. In a hemodynamic study, intraosseous pressure in the second thoracic or the second or third lumbar vertebral body, intraosseous pressure in the calcaneus, and systemic arterial blood pressure were measured continuously before and after the caudal epidural injection of 20 ml of 1% lidocaine during posterior cervical or lumbar spine surgery in 42 patients. RESULTS: Total and hourly intraoperative blood loss during posterior lumbar interbody fusion was significantly less in the group with blockade than in the group without blockade, but the values during cervical laminoplasty showed no significant difference between the two groups. The lumbar vertebral intraosseous pressure decreased significantly after epidural injection, whereas the second thoracic vertebral and the calcaneal in traosseous pressure did not decrease significantly. The ratio of lumbar vertebral intraosseous pressure to arterial pressure decreased continuously after epidural injection, whereas the ratio of the calcaneal intraosseous pressure to arterial pressure transiently increased. CONCLUSIONS: The epidural blockade reduces intraoperative bleeding, even under normotensive conditions, and it takes effect in the lumbar spine, but not in the upper thoracic or cervical spine. This effect appears to be due chiefly to venous hypotension in the lumbar spine, which may be created by sympathetic blockade, with arteriolar dilatation and venous pooling in the lower limbs and reactive vasoconstriction in the lumbar vertebrae.

Anesthesia, Epidural