Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 17186746

Hidden patterns of play interaction in soccer using SOF-CODER.

Abstract

Traditional methods for quantifying sport performances are limited in their capacity to describe the complex interactions of events that occur within a performance over time. The following article outlines a new approach to the study of actions between players in team sports--mainly, soccer. Since the observational design is nomothetic, point, and multidimensional, an observational and data-collecting instrument has been developed. The instrument is mixed and combines a field format with a category system for game events, as well as an ad hoc instrument that considers the game actions of one or both teams, each recorded according to the same criteria. The article also outlines a new approach to the analysis of time-based event records--in this case, sports performance--known as T-pattern detection. The relevant elements of the T-pattern detection process are explained, and exemplar data from analyses of soccer matches are presented to highlight the potential of this form of data analysis. The results suggest that it is possible to identify new kinds of profiles for both individuals and teams on the basis of observational criteria and a further analysis of temporal behavioral patterns detected within the performances.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Gudberg K Jonsson, M Teresa Anguera, Angel Blanco-Villaseñor, José Luis Losada, Antonio Hernández-Mendo, Toni Ardá, Oleguer Camerino, Julen Castellano. 2006. Hidden patterns of play interaction in soccer using SOF-CODER.. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03192790

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Value of high-cost cancer care: a behavioral science perspective.

Concerns about the high costs of cancer care have led to a renewed interest in understanding how patients value the outcomes of care. Psychologists, economists, and others have highlighted some of the ways in which patients and caregivers perceive and make treatment decisions. Prospect theory is the predominant framework for understanding decisions made in situations where the outcomes of each choice are uncertain. Prospect theory assumes that a patient values the outcomes of care not in absolute terms, such as years of life saved, but as deviations from the patient's point of reference. This article discusses some of the implications of this notion, along with discussing differences among people in their reference points. These and other considerations from the psychology of decision making help to clarify why some patients might be inclined to seek expensive or risky treatments in the hopes of achieving benefits that others might consider not worthwhile. An appreciation of these psychological issues might improve the quality of debates concerning the rising costs of cancer care.

Behavioral Sciences↗