Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 16949377

Baseline renal function screening.

Abstract

Renal impairment at baseline (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) is the most important risk marker to predict the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients receiving iodinated contrast media. Hence, it is important to assess renal function before administration of contrast medium to ensure that appropriate steps are taken to reduce the risk. Serum creatinine alone does not provide a reliable measure of renal function, hence the National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) recommends that clinicians should use an eGFR calculated from the serum creatinine as an index of renal function. The CIN Consensus Working Panel agreed that eGFR should be determined before contrast administration, using the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula, recommended by K/DOQI as the preferred equation for the calculation of eGFR in adults. Where a serum creatinine measurement or eGFR is not available, a simple survey or questionnaire can be used before contrast agent administration to identify patients at higher risk for CIN compared with the general population. In emergency situations, where the benefit of very early imaging outweighs the risk of waiting, the CIN Consensus Working Panel agreed that the procedure can be performed without assessment of renal function.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Norbert Lameire, Andy Adam, Christoph R Becker, Charles Davidson, Peter A McCullough, Fulvio Stacul, James Tumlin, CIN Consensus Working Panel. 2006-02-20. Baseline renal function screening.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.01.021

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Holiday waistline. Time to consensus: the effect of the stomach on consensus decision-making at large conferences.

INTRODUCTION: The factors affecting decision-making at consensus conferences are not well understood. This paper studies the complex association between time to consensus (TTC) and the timing and quality of food, as well as the self-reported level of frustration (PITA factor) with the question at hand. METHODS: We came, we saw, we ate. RESULTS: There was an association between the TTC and the time to eating, especially lunch. There was a trend to faster TTC the better the researchers rated the food. The speed of decision-making was also increased when the PITA score was high, especially late in the day. INTERPRETATION: Organizers of large consensus conferences need to be aware of these factors in decision-making and should try to use them to get more controversial items voted to their satisfaction.

Consensus Statements as Topic↗