Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 16915972

Cutting both ways.

Matthew Weinstock
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Health care coverage is by far the biggest cost of doing business for most American companies large and small. Many are trying to cope by reducing or eliminating health benefits for retirees. That's an unhappy shock for their former employees--and it is bound to have disturbing consequences for providers.

Explore related subjects

Cost SharingCost of IllnessEconomics, HospitalEmployer Health CostsForecastingHealth Benefit Plans, EmployeeHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMedically UninsuredMiddle AgedRetirementUncompensated CareUnited StatesJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Matthew Weinstock. 2006. Cutting both ways.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16915972/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Tracking health care costs: continued stability but at high rates in 2005.

Health care spending per privately insured person increased 7.4 percent in 2005, marking the third year that the cost trend hovered between 7 and 8 percent following double-digit trends in 2001 and 2002. Data for the first quarter of 2006 suggest continued stability. The trend for 2005 reflected increased growth in spending for hospital and physician care, offsetting a sharp drop in spending growth for prescription drugs. Hospital utilization trends accelerated, while price trends decelerated in 2005. In contrast to stable spending trends in 2005, premium trends continued to decline in 2006, likely reflecting the lagged effects of earlier years' slowing in cost trends and perhaps signaling a turn in the insurance underwriting cycle.

Cost Sharing↗
PubMed2006

Reconsidering the moral hazard-risk avoidance tradeoff.

The received model for optimal demand-side cost sharing trades off moral hazard and risk avoidance. This model appears to lie behind recent increases in initial cost sharing, such as those embodied in Health Savings Accounts and Health Reimbursement Accounts. At the same time there is evidence that lower cost sharing for certain drugs can reduce future total health care costs and/or improve future health, and this may be true of other medical services as well. To the degree that individuals remain in the same common insurance pool, lower cost sharing that induces increases in certain services that reduce total costs, including future costs, represents a classic case for a subsidy and will minimize an employer's labor costs. Even if total costs increase, the value of a change in health could increase more. In that case such a subsidy is consistent with recent work in behavioral economics for those with self-control problems.

Cost Sharing↗