Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 16911904

Optimizing telephone-based population sampling--a reply.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Anthony M A Smith, Richard O de Visser, Chris E Rissel. 2006. Optimizing telephone-based population sampling--a reply.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2006.07.001

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Evaluation of clinical research knowledge and interest among pharmacy residents: survey design and validation.

PURPOSE: The development and validation of a survey to describe the research knowledge, attitudes, and skills of pharmacy practice residents are described. SUMMARY: A survey was drafted to determine if pharmacy practice residency experience and the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP)-required project improve the residents' objectively and subjectively assessed research knowledge, to determine if the residency experience and the ASHP-required project affect the residents' attitudes regarding research as a component of their future professional practice, and to subjectively assess the effect of the residency experience and the ASHP-required project on other essential skills, such as problem solving, critical thinking, and time management. An initial questionnaire was developed and underwent content validation testing by clinical pharmacists and faculty, residents, and research fellows. Following content validation, the questionnaire underwent construct validity testing (for discriminative validity and responsiveness) in students, residents, and clinical pharmacists and faculty. Reliability was tested in a subgroup of subjects who completed the questionnaire twice within two to four weeks. From the content validation phase, average scores for individual questions ranged from 1.00 to 2.00. Discriminative validity testing of the revised questionnaire demonstrated the instrument's ability to discriminate between groups expected to differ. Effect-size and mean-knowledge score differences indicated high levels of responsiveness, signifying the instrument's ability to detect change over time or after an intervention. CONCLUSION: A survey questionnaire developed to measure research knowledge and interest among pharmacy practice residents demonstrated its validity and reliability with significant sensitivity and responsiveness.

Data Collection↗

The earnings of U.S. health economists.

This paper presents data from a 2005 survey of health economists who were U.S. members of the International Health Economics Association or the Health Economics Special Interest Group of Academy Health. We present summary statistics of health economist earnings by rank and type of employer, estimate log earnings models as a function of education, experience, type of employer, and research productivity, and provide summary statistics of starting salaries expected to be offered to new Ph.D. health economists by type of employer. Our findings are compared to those for economics departments, business schools, schools of public health, and for health services researchers.

Data Collection↗

Using focus groups to develop contingent valuation scenarios--a case study of women's groups in rural Nepal.

The construction of a contingent valuation (CV) scenario forms a critical component of willingness-to-pay (WTP) survey design, especially when working across diverse cultural and socio-economic settings. However, the methods used to develop CV scenarios have not been well reported in the health economics literature. This paper begins by describing how qualitative methods can be used to develop CV surveys. It then presents a case study illustrating how focus groups were used to develop a CV survey to value a women's group intervention in rural Nepal. A series of focus group discussions were conducted with three stakeholder groups. These were used to determine the most appropriate description of the good to be valued and the means by which payment would be elicited. These methods were very helpful in designing the survey tool and choosing the key attributes to describe the intervention. They also familiarised field workers with the concept of WTP. Further work of this kind will help to highlight additional advantages and limitations of qualitative approaches to survey design.

Data Collection↗