PubMed · 1674065
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
1991-05-25. Operating to prevent stroke.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1674065/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Mechanical stresses in arterial walls are known to be implicated in the development of atherosclerosis. While shear stress and circumferential stress have received a lot of attention, axial stress has not. Yet, stenoses can be intuitively expected to produce a supplementary axial stress during flow systole in the region immediately proximal to the constriction cone. In this paper, a model for the estimation of this effect is presented, and ten numerical examples are computed. These examples show that the cyclic increase in axial stress can be quite considerable in severe stenoses (typically 120% or more of the normal stress value). This result is in best agreement with the known mechanical or morphological risk factors of stenosis progression and restenosis (hypertension, elevated pulse pressure, degree of stenosis, stenosis geometry, residual stenosis, etc). The supplementary axial stress generated by a stenosis might create the damages in the endothelium and in the elastic membranes which potentiate the action of the other risk factors (hyperlipidaemia, diabetes, etc). It could thus be an important cause of stenosis progression and of restenosis.
OBJECTIVE: Controversy still exists whether polytetrafluoroethylene is equivalent to vein as bypass graft material for the above-knee femoropopliteal bypass. Therefore, a prospective randomized trial was performed to compare vein with polytetrafluoroethylene for femoropopliteal bypasses with the distal anastomosis above the knee. METHODS: Between January 1993 and December 1996, 151 above-knee femoropopliteal bypasses were performed. The indications for operation were severe claudication in 120 cases, rest pain in 20 cases, and ulceration in 11 cases. After randomization, 75 reversed saphenous venous bypasses and 76 polytetrafluoroethylene bypasses were performed. RESULTS: No perioperative mortality was seen, and 5% of the patients had minor infections of the wound, not resulting in loss of the bypass, the limb, or life. After 5 years, 38% of the patients had died and 7% were lost to follow-up. Only once was the saphenous vein necessary for coronary artery bypass grafting. Primary patency rates after 5 years were 75.6% for venous bypass grafts and 51.9% for polytetrafluoroethylene grafts (P =.035). Secondary patency rates were 79.7% for vein and 57.2% for polytetrafluoroethylene bypasses (P =.036). In the venous group, 14 bypasses failed, leading to five new bypasses. In the polytetrafluoroethylene group, 29 bypasses failed, leading to 16 reinterventions. For these 16 new bypasses, in four cases, the ipsilateral preserved saphenous vein was used. In both groups, one above-knee amputation and one below-knee amputation had to be performed. CONCLUSION: We conclude after 5 years of follow-up of this randomized controlled trial that a bypass with saphenous vein has better patency rates at all intervals and needs fewer reoperations. Saphenous vein should be the graft material of choice for above-knee femoropopliteal bypasses and should not be preserved for reinterventions. Polytetrafluoroethylene is an acceptable alternative if the saphenous vein is not available.
In a critical distal right coronary artery bifurcation lesion, the proximal course of the posterior descending artery was also subtotally occluded. The posterior descending artery gave rise to a small sidebranch just before the occlusion. In the subsequent revascularization procedure, the bifurcation lesion was double-wired. One wire was placed in the postero-lateral branch, and another wire was intended for placement in the posterior descending artery, but it repeatedly selected the sidebranch despite multiple shapings of the wire tip. While the second wire was deliberately kept in the sidebranch, a third wire was used and crossed the occlusive lesion without much difficulty. The second wire was then withdrawn and the revascularization procedure proceeded in the usual manner. The positioning of the second wire in the sidebranch significantly shortened the procedure.