Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 16716639

Retinal assessment using optical coherence tomography.

Rogério A Costa·Mirian Skaf·Luiz A S Melo·Daniela Calucci·Jose A Cardillo·Jarbas C Castro·David Huang·Maciej Wojtkowski
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Over the 15 years since the original description, optical coherence tomography (OCT) has become one of the key diagnostic technologies in the ophthalmic subspecialty areas of retinal diseases and glaucoma. The reason for the widespread adoption of this technology originates from at least two properties of the OCT results: on the one hand, the results are accessible to the non-specialist where microscopic retinal abnormalities are grossly and easily noticeable; on the other hand, results are reproducible and exceedingly quantitative in the hands of the specialist. However, as in any other imaging technique in ophthalmology, some artifacts are expected to occur. Understanding of the basic principles of image acquisition and data processing as well as recognition of OCT limitations are crucial issues to using this equipment with cleverness. Herein, we took a brief look in the past of OCT and have explained the key basic physical principles of this imaging technology. In addition, each of the several steps encompassing a third generation OCT evaluation of retinal tissues has been addressed in details. A comprehensive explanation about next generation OCT systems has also been provided and, to conclude, we have commented on the future directions of this exceptional technique.

Explore related subjects

Anatomy, Cross-SectionalGlaucomaHumansReproducibility of ResultsRetinaRetinal DiseasesTomography, Optical CoherenceJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Rogério A Costa, Mirian Skaf, Luiz A S Melo, Daniela Calucci, Jose A Cardillo, Jarbas C Castro, David Huang, Maciej Wojtkowski. 2006-05-22. Retinal assessment using optical coherence tomography.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2006.03.001

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

High-field magnetic resonance imaging of meniscoids in the zygapophyseal joints of the human cervical spine.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective in vitro study of meniscoids in the cervical zygapophysial joints. OBJECTIVES.: To assess the use of high-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a potential tool for evaluating meniscoids of the cervical zygapophysial joints. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pain originating from the cervical spine is a frequent condition. It has been suggested that pathologic conditions of meniscoids within the zygapophysial joints may cause pain. METHODS: Six zygapophysial joints from one embalmed human body were investigated with a 3.0-T MR unit, equipped with a microimaging-set. MRIs were correlated with microanatomical sections. RESULTS: High-quality images of the meniscoids were obtained for all joints examined. There was a good correlation between the anatomic features derived from MRI and the microanatomical sections. CONCLUSIONS: High-field MRI was successfully implemented as a noninvasive method for imaging the meniscoids in cervical zygapophysial joints. The results of this in vitro study indicate that high-field MRI may be feasible in evaluating patients with cervical pain possibly related to meniscoid pathology.

Anatomy, Cross-Sectional↗
PubMed2007

Digimouse: a 3D whole body mouse atlas from CT and cryosection data.

We have constructed a three-dimensional (3D) whole body mouse atlas from coregistered x-ray CT and cryosection data of a normal nude male mouse. High quality PET, x-ray CT and cryosection images were acquired post mortem from a single mouse placed in a stereotactic frame with fiducial markers visible in all three modalities. The image data were coregistered to a common coordinate system using the fiducials and resampled to an isotropic 0.1 mm voxel size. Using interactive editing tools we segmented and labelled whole brain, cerebrum, cerebellum, olfactory bulbs, striatum, medulla, masseter muscles, eyes, lachrymal glands, heart, lungs, liver, stomach, spleen, pancreas, adrenal glands, kidneys, testes, bladder, skeleton and skin surface. The final atlas consists of the 3D volume, in which the voxels are labelled to define the anatomical structures listed above, with coregistered PET, x-ray CT and cryosection images. To illustrate use of the atlas we include simulations of 3D bioluminescence and PET image reconstruction. Optical scatter and absorption values are assigned to each organ to simulate realistic photon transport within the animal for bioluminescence imaging. Similarly, 511 keV photon attenuation values are assigned to each structure in the atlas to simulate realistic photon attenuation in PET. The Digimouse atlas and data are available at http://neuroimage.usc.edu/Digimouse.html.

Anatomy, Cross-Sectional↗
PubMed2007

Coronary artery stenosis quantification using multislice computed tomography.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Reliable noninvasive detection of stenoses with multislice computed tomography (MSCT) is feasible. This study's aim was to analyze the agreement, correlation, and reliability of MSCT with conventional coronary angiography as the reference standard for quantification of coronary artery stenoses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 118 significant (at least 50%) coronary artery stenoses with a reference vessel diameter of at least 1.5 mm in 62 patients were analyzed by MSCT using 16 detector rows (Aquilion, Toshiba, Otawara, Japan), multisegment reconstruction, and voxel sizes of 0.35x0.35x0.5 mm. The degree of stenosis on MSCT and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) was measured by correlating the difference between the reference vessel diameter (average of 2 measurements directly proximal and distal to the stenosis) and the stenotic vessel diameter to the reference vessel diameter. RESULTS: Correlation between the percent diameter stenosis determined by MSCT (78.2+/-13.6%) and QCA (76.0+/-14.8%) was significant (P<0.001) but only moderately so (R=0.51). Bland-Altman analysis revealed no systematic under- or overestimation with MSCT but large limits of agreements (+/-27.6%). Also the limits of agreement for interobserver agreement (reliability) of MSCT data were considerably large (+/-24.8%). Among the 27 coronary artery stenoses with a reference diameter of at least 3.5 mm, there was improved correlation (R=0.80) and the limits of agreement between MSCT and QCA were significantly smaller (+/-17.3%, P<0.008). The agreement between MSCT and QCA was not significantly different for stenoses with no calcification or only calcium spots (+/-28.2%) as compared with those with moderate-or-severe calcifications (+/-27.3%; P=0.8). MSCT allowed correct classification of coronary stenoses into low-grade (below 75%) and high-grade stenoses (at least 75%), in 62% (73 of 118). CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy and reliability of coronary artery stenosis quantification with MSCT using isotropic voxel sizes and multisegment reconstruction is still too low to recommend routine clinical application because of rather low agreement, correlation, and reliability. Despite these limitations, the current results demonstrate the potential of MSCT for reliable and accurate quantification of coronary artery stenoses in the near future provided that further improvements in spatial and temporal resolution will be achieved.

Anatomy, Cross-Sectional↗