PubMed · 16427879
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
William L Holman. 2006. Invited commentary.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.07.093
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is a ubiquitous disease affecting one in seven women. While breast conservation techniques are available for local control of the disease for many patients, not all patients are good candidates for these techniques. Mastectomy, therefore, remains a common method of breast cancer treatment. Methods of reconstruction include implant reconstruction and autogenous reconstruction. The advantages of autogenous reconstruction include the creation of a soft, ptotic breast mound, which tends to match a native contralateral breast both in and out of bra support. Autogenous reconstructions do not tend to change with time and usually do not require periodic revision as seen in implant reconstructions. METHODS: The most common method of autogenous reconstruction is the TRAM flap, either pedicled or free. The TRAM flap employs the redundant excess lower abdominal tissue typically removed during a cosmetic abdominoplasty. This tissue is brought to the mastectomy defect as a pedicled flap, passing subcutaneously from the upper abdomen and into the defect site. The pedicled flap is based upon the superior epigastric vessels. A free TRAM is harvested with the overlying muscle and the attached inferior epigastric vessels. This flap is completely separated from the abdomen and brought to the chest defect where it is anastomosed to either the thoracodorsal or internal mammary vessels. The donor defect within the abdominal wall is repaired with an inlay mesh with both the pedicled and free techniques. RESULTS: Patient selection criteria usually help determine which technique is used. The advantage of the free flap technique is improved blood supply to the skin island. The free flap, therefore, is used in patients at higher risk for partial flap loss with the pedicled technique. Such high-risk patients include smokers, the obese, patients with significant medical comorbidities, and patients with prior abdominal surgery. Patients without these risk factors can be expected to achieve good results with either the pedicled or free flap technique. CONCLUSION: Autogenous breast reconstruction with the TRAM flap achieves long lasting satisfactory results in most patients with the creation of a soft, naturally ptotic breast mound, which typically matches well a contralateral native breast.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the effects of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on the healing of tracheal anastomosis following radiation therapy in rats. METHODS: Fifty-six male Wistar rats were divided into four groups. Group 1 underwent tracheal anastomosis. Group 2 underwent radiation therapy followed by tracheal anastomosis. Group 3 underwent radiation therapy followed by tracheal anastomosis and received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Group 4 underwent sham radiation therapy followed by sham tracheal anastomosis. At 10 days following radiation therapy, the trachea was dissected for histopathological, mechanical and biochemical evaluation. RESULTS: Median scores for inflammation were three points for Group 1, two points for Group 2, two points for Group 3 and one point for Group 4. Median scores for angiogenesis were four points for Group 1, two points for Group 2, three points for Group 3 and one point for Group 4. Median scores for connective tissue regeneration were four points for Group 1, two points for Group 2, three points for Group 3 and one point for Group 4. Median scores for epithelial regeneration were two points for Group 1, one point for Group 2, one point for Group 3 and one point for Group 4. Mean anastomotic bursting pressures were 853 mmHg for Group 1, 293 mmHg for Group 2, 417 mmHg for Group 3 and 966 mmHg for Group 4. Mean hydroxyproline concentrations were 159 microg/mg for Group 1, 177 microg/mg for Group 2, 120 microg/mg for Group 3 and 117 microg/mg for Group 4. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that granulocyte colony-stimulating factor contributes to the healing of tracheal anastomosis following radiation therapy through improved connective tissue regeneration.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the requirement for surgical reoperation and catheter-based reintervention to central pulmonary arteries (CPAs) following Norwood Procedure (NP). We sought to identify the influence of various surgical techniques employed during NP on subsequent interventions. METHODS: Between 1993 and 2004, 226 patients underwent Stage II following NP. Ninety-eight patients (43%) had completion of Fontan circulation (Stage III) and a further 107 (47%) are on course for Fontan completion with 21 (9%) inter-stage deaths. During NP, the aortic arch was reconstructed without additional material (n = 91, 40%) or with a pulmonary homograft patch (n = 135, 60%). Pulmonary blood flow was supplied by modified Blalock-Taussig shunt (n = 177, 78%) or right ventricle to pulmonary artery conduit (RV-PA; n = 49, 22%). The CPAs defect was closed directly (n = 69, 31%) or with a patch (n = 157, 69%). Complete resection of coarctation was performed in 126 patients (56%). RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients (43%) required surgical reoperation to CPAs during Stage II. Actuarial freedom from reoperation was 60+/-3%, 52+/-4% and 50+/-4% at 1, 5 and 10 years, respectively. On multivariable analysis, NP with RV-PA increased risk of reoperation (LR 8.3, 5.3-13.2; p < 0.001). Forty-one patients (18%) required catheter-based reintervention on CPAs. Actuarial freedom from reintervention was 98+/-1%, 72+/-4% and 58+/-6% at 1, 5 and 10 years, respectively. CPA problems were almost exclusively limited to the proximal Left pulmonary artery. On multivariable analysis, catheter-based reintervention became more common with time. Complete resection of coarctation increased risk of reintervention (LR 3.9, 1.6-9.6; p < 0.005). Arch reconstruction and CPAs repair techniques did not affect risk of reoperation or reintervention on CPAs. CONCLUSIONS: CPA stenoses and hypoplasia need surgical attention in approximately half of all patients undergoing the NP. The need for reoperation is increased when using the RV-PA conduit technique (although the majority of these are performed as part of the Stage II procedure). Catheter reinterventions are almost exclusively confined to the left CPA and are increased when the arch is shortened by resection of the coarctation tissue at time of NP.