Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 16370821

Construct validity and content analysis.

Abstract

We clarify points of agreement and disagreement with Schnurr, Rosenberg, and Oxman, as put forth in their article appearing this issue. Speech samples elicited under different conditions may or may not be interchangeable. This is a matter of empirical research, but it is also dependent upon the meaningfulness of the content categories. used in the analysis. We prefer a theory-driven, construct validational approach that employs well validated coding schemes to assess psychologically meaningful concepts.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D P McAdams, P B Zeldow. 1993. Construct validity and content analysis.. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6102_5

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations