Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 16273803

The CORRONA database.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Large, long-term databases are needed in order to provide information on the safety and efficacy of new agents used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). These databases can provide data which is well beyond what is available from industry-sponsored investigations. METHODS: The structure, governance, content, context and developmental plan of the CORRONA database is described. RESULTS: The CORRONA database has grown from start up in 2002 to the largest independent database in North America which collects data from both rheumatologists and patients at the time of a clinical encounter. Data are collected as often as every 3 months in RA and every 6 months in PsA. As of the time of this writing, the CORRONA database consists of approximately 9,000 patients with RA and 1,000 with PsA. Data can be used to elucidate toxicities found in frequencies which would be considerably less common than can be uncovered in industry-sponsored investigations. In addition, actual prescribing patterns and responses in clinical practice can be investigated and described. CONCLUSION: After 3 years of data collection, the CORRONA database is now appropriately able to make significant contributions to our understanding of the safety, efficacy of drugs, as well as demographic, and socioeconomic profiles of patients with RA and PsA. It has evolved from a nascent database to a mature one poised to make significant contributions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J M Kremer. The CORRONA database.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16273803/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Aspects of early arthritis. Traditional DMARD therapy: is it sufficient?

There is increasing evidence for beneficial effects of early DMARD (disease-modifying antirheumatic drug) therapy over delayed treatment in patients who present with arthritis of recent onset. However, no universal consensus exists concerning the choice of initial drug or whether single drugs or combinations should be given as initial treatments. Recent studies have focused on the benefits of various strategies in which treatments were tailored to achieve low levels of disease activity, as assessed using validated response criteria. These studies demonstrated superiority of 'aggressive' over 'conventional' approaches. Whether the inclusion of tumour necrosis factor antagonists or other biologic targeted therapies in such strategies confers additional benefits in terms of improved long-term outcomes must be clarified by further studies. Assessment of risks in the individual patient, allowing individual 'tailoring' of the initial treatment, would be desirable.

Antirheumatic Agents↗

Drug delivery in degenerative joint disease: where we are and where to go?

Drug discovery and delivery to retard the degeneration of joint tissues are challenging. Current treatment is generally inadequate. This commentary places in perspective the inadequacy characteristic of existing therapeutics and the promising developments embodied in the newer therapeutics administered via the oral or intra-auricular routes.

Antirheumatic Agents↗