Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Rheumatology”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

Timeliness of publication of randomized controlled trials in rheumatology: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the (1) timeliness of publication of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in rheumatology, (2) impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on time to publication, and (3) factors associated with publication delays. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, EBM Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus from January 1, 2018, to June 30, 2023 for Phase 3, superiority, parallel-design RCTs that evaluated any treatment for a rheumatologic illness or a rheumatologic treatment for COVID-19 and reported clinical primary efficacy outcome. Outcomes of interest were time to publication after trial completion and publication delay of >2 years after trial completion. RESULTS: 448 RCTs were included in this systematic review. Median time from completion to publication was 549 days and 65.9 % RCTs were published within 2 years of completion. Compared with RCTs on rheumatologic diseases, RCTs on COVID-19 were published sooner (253 vs. 549 days; p < 0.001) and were more likely to be published within 2 years (adjusted OR 9.49, 95 % CI 2.07 to 43.61). Compared with RCTs completed before March 1, 2020, RCTs completed after March 1, 2020, were published sooner (327 vs. 724 days; p < 0.001) and were more likely to be published within 2 years (adjusted OR 9.40, 95 % CI 5.14 to 17.21). Time from RCT completion to submission accounted for most (67 %) of the time to publication. CONCLUSIONS: Publication delay continues to be an important concern in dissemination of clinical research. Most of the delays in publication were attributable to delays in submission to journals after trial completion.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Timing of OMERACT core domain measurement in gout clinical trials: a systematic review of randomised trials.

AIMS: The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) initiative has endorsed core domain sets for gout trials. The aims of this study were to evaluate the time points and frequencies at which the gout core domains are measured in existing gout urate-lowering therapy and gout flare trials, and whether all collected measurements were reported. METHODS: Urate-lowering therapy (n = 29) and gout flare randomised clinical trials (n = 14) from 2005 were identified from a prior systematic review of core domain reporting. Data were extracted for the time points and frequencies at which each core domain was measured, as well as whether all collected measurements were reported. RESULTS: In urate-lowering therapy trials, the core domains were measured at seven different frequencies. Serum urate and gout flares were most commonly measured monthly, and tophus burden was most commonly measured three monthly. Reporting of all collected measurements varied, from 24/29 (83%) trials for serum urate to 0/2 (0%) trials for activity limitation. In gout flare trials, core domains were measured at nine different frequencies. Pain, joint tenderness and joint swelling were most commonly measured monthly. Reporting of all collected measurements varied, from 13/14 (93%) trials for pain to 3/8 (37.5%) trials for joint tenderness. CONCLUSION: In both urate-lowering therapy and gout flare trials, there is substantial variability in when the core domains are measured, and reporting of collected measurements is inconsistent. This work provides the foundation for a consensus process to establish standardised time points and frequencies for measuring the OMERACT-endorsed gout core domains.

Gout↗
PubMed2026

Diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of pediatric Beh&#xe7;et's disease: Systematic literature review informing the ISSAID/PRES recommendations.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric-onset Beh&#xe7;et's disease (BD) accounts for up to 20% of cases and represents a distinct clinical entity characterized by evolving phenotypes and age-specific patterns of organ involvement. This systematic literature review synthesizes current evidence on pediatric BD, informing forthcoming recommendations by the International Society of Systemic Auto-Inflammatory Diseases (ISSAID) and the Pediatric Rheumatology European Society (PReS). METHODS: A systematic search was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Observational studies reporting clinical features, diagnostic criteria, management strategies, and outcomes in BD patients diagnosed before the age of 16&#xa0;years were included. Proportional meta-analysis was performed to give pooled estimates for organ system involvement. RESULTS: Fifty-two studies, encompassing 2929 patients, met inclusion criteria. Sex distribution was balanced, with a 1:1 male-to-female ratio. The age of onset differed, with 1&#xa0;year old being the lowest median age of onset and 2&#xa0;years the lowest median age of diagnosis. The pooled random-effects estimate demonstrated that 50% of patients were HLA-B51 positive (95% CI, 0.5-0.6). Mucocutaneous manifestations were nearly universal (97.8%) and frequently represented the initial feature (80.9%). Musculoskeletal (36%), ocular (35%), neurological (17.9%), gastrointestinal (20%), vascular (15.4%) manifestations showed substantial variability in prevalence. Therapeutic approaches varied widely and were extrapolated from adult practice, with treatment guided by organ involvement and severity. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric BD encompasses a heterogeneous spectrum of phenotypes requiring harmonized diagnostic frameworks, structured phenotypic stratification, and standardized monitoring to improve long-term outcomes. The relative burden and combination of organ manifestations varied across cohorts, reflecting both biological heterogeneity and differences in study design.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

EDucation and eXercise for gluteal tendinopathy in an Irish context (EDX-Ireland): findings from the LEAP-Ireland feasibility randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigating effectiveness of 6 sessions of an EDucation and eXercise intervention delivered over 8 weeks (EDX-Ireland) for gluteal tendinopathy, against usual care. EDX-Ireland was modified from a 14-session EDucation and eXercise intervention (EDX), delivered over 8 weeks, previously evaluated in an Australian RCT. DESIGN: Feasibility parallel RCT. METHODS: Participants were randomly assigned to physiotherapist-led EDX-Ireland or usual care. EDX-Ireland comprised 6 sessions of education, hip abductor strengthening and functional loading over 8 weeks, supported by a home exercise programme. Primary outcomes included success of different recruitment strategies and recruitment/retention rates. Secondary outcomes measured global rating of change and other clinical outcomes. Descriptive statistics (percentage, mean, standard deviations and 95% confidence intervals (CI)) are presented. RESULTS: Of 323 individuals who expressed interest in study participation, 119 completed physical examination screening, and 65 met criteria and consented to participate (recruitment rate 55%). Sixty-five people (89% women; mean age 53.1&#x202f;&#xb1;&#x202f;9.3 years), were randomised to EDX-Ireland (n&#x202f;=&#x202f;32) or usual care (n&#x202f;=&#x202f;33). Eighty-three percent (n&#x202f;=&#x202f;54) were recruited via social media/community, 3% (n&#x202f;=&#x202f;2) from general practitioners and 14% (n&#x202f;=&#x202f;9) from orthopaedic/rheumatology. Retention was 92% (95% CI 82-97%, n&#x202f;=&#x202f;60) at 8-weeks, and 89% (95% CI 79-96%, n&#x202f;=&#x202f;58) at 3-months. Feasibility thresholds were met. Effect size estimates indicate that 134 participants would be required for a future RCT. CONCLUSION: Pre-defined recruitment and retention thresholds were met, indicating that a RCT evaluating 6 sessions of physiotherapist-delivered education and exercise against usual care for gluteal tendinopathy is feasible. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05516563).

Humans↗