Controlled microfluidic interfaces.

Javier Atencia; David J Beebe

doi:10.1038/nature04163

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 16193039

Controlled microfluidic interfaces.

Javier Atencia·David J Beebe

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The microfabrication technologies of the semiconductor industry have made it possible to integrate increasingly complex electronic and mechanical functions, providing us with ever smaller, cheaper and smarter sensors and devices. These technologies have also spawned microfluidics systems for containing and controlling fluid at the micrometre scale, where the increasing importance of viscosity and surface tension profoundly affects fluid behaviour. It is this confluence of available microscale engineering and scale-dependence of fluid behaviour that has revolutionized our ability to precisely control fluid/fluid interfaces for use in fields ranging from materials processing and analytical chemistry to biology and medicine.

Explore related subjects

Diffusion Microfluidics Phase Transition Surface Properties Surface Tension Journal Article Review

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Javier Atencia, David J Beebe. 2005-09-29. Controlled microfluidic interfaces.. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04163

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Single-file diffusion near channel boundaries.

Molecular transport under the conditions of single-file diffusion was investigated near the channel boundaries by using dynamic Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics simulations of tracer exchange between single-file channels and their surroundings. The boundary effect reported in our recent papers (Vasenkov S.; Kärger, J. Phys. Rev. E 2002, 66, 052601. Schüring, A.; Vasenkov S.; Fritzsche, S. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 16711) was studied in detail. This boundary effect is characterized by deviations of the intrachannel concentration profiles of tracer molecules observed in the case of single-file diffusion near the channel boundaries from the corresponding profiles typical for normal diffusion. It has been shown in our previous studies that these deviations occur under the conditions when the potential-energy difference inside and outside of single-file channels was both comparable and much larger than the activation energy of intrachannel diffusion. Here, we report a quantitative model describing the boundary effect. According to this model, an occurrence of the boundary effect is related to a complex character of diffusion in finite single-file systems. Such diffusion can be described by the following two types of movements occurring in parallel: (i) correlated displacements of all molecules in any particular channel and (ii) fast displacements of single molecules, which are uncorrelated with the displacements of all other molecules in the same channel. The latter displacements are restricted to a certain length interval that depends on the channel length and the channel occupancy. This length interval is shown to determine the extensions of the channel margins where the boundary effect is observed.

Diffusion↗

PubMed2006

Molecular modeling and simulation of water near model micelles: diffusion, rotational relaxation and structure at the hydration interface.

This paper reports on molecular dynamics simulations of two hydrated micelles composed of C12E6 and LDAO surfactants. The simulations results provide a quantitative picture of the dynamics of the hydration water at the water/micelle interface. Both the residence time of water near the micelle surface and its retardation with respect to the bulk have been estimated. It is found that the water dynamics is radically different for the two micellar systems and depends on the physical nature of the micelle surface in contact with water. For C12E6 this interface is thicker and presents a stronger hydrophilic character than that of LDAO. Thus, in C12E6, surface water dynamics is 1-2 orders of magnitude slower than that of bulk water, compared with only 18% for the LDAO system. The simulations have also revealed the nature of the rotational landscape experienced by water at the micellar surface: In the C12E6 micelle water rotation occurs in a highly anisotropic space due to confinement of waters at the interface; in LDAO the rotational landscape is instead isotropic. These findings clearly indicate that the slowdown of interfacial water relaxation near complex micelles depends, case by case, on the structural properties of the interface itself, such as the ratio between hydrophobic/hydrophilic exposed regions and on the interface thickness and topography.

Diffusion↗

PubMed2006

Thermal diffusion behavior of nonionic surfactants in water.

We studied the thermal diffusion behavior of hexaethylene glycol monododecyl ether (C12E6) in water by means of thermal diffusion forced Rayleigh scattering (TDFRS) and determined Soret coefficients, thermal diffusion coefficients, and diffusion constants at different temperatures and concentrations. At low surfactant concentrations, the measured Soret coefficient is positive, which implies that surfactant micelles move toward the cold region in a temperature gradient. For C12E6/water at a high surfactant concentration of w1 = 90 wt % and a temperature of T = 25 degrees C, however, a negative Soret coefficient S(T) was observed. Because the concentration part of the TDFRS diffraction signal for binary systems is expected to consist of a single mode, we were surprised to find a second, slow mode for C12E6/water system in a certain temperature and concentration range. To clarify the origin of this second mode, we investigated also, tetraethylene glycol monohexyl ether (C6E4), tetraethylene glycol monooctyl ether (C8E4), pentaethylene glycol monododecyl ether (C12E5), and octaethylene glycol monohexadecyl ether (C16E8) and compared the results with the previous results for octaethylene glycol monodecyl ether (C10E8). Except for C6E4 and C10E8, a second slow mode was observed in all systems usually for state points close to the phase boundary. The diffusion coefficient and Soret coefficient derived from the fast mode can be identified as the typical mutual diffusion and Soret coefficients of the micellar solutions and compare well with the independently determined diffusion coefficients in a dynamic light scattering experiment. Experiments with added salt show that the slow mode is suppressed by the addition of w(NaCl) = 0.02 mol/L sodium chloride. This suggests that the slow mode is related to the small amount of absorbing ionic dye, less than 10(-5) by weight, which is added in TDFRS experiments to create a temperature grating. The origin of the slow mode of the TDFRS signal will be tentatively interpreted in terms of a ternary mixture of neutral micelles, dye-charged micelles, and water.

Diffusion↗