Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 1617005

A microcomputer program for evaluating sampling error: an application to stereological methods for electron microscopy.

Abstract

In situations where there is a need to minimize sampling error or sample size, the coefficient of variation (CV) may be used to evaluate sampling error as a function of the number of observations or subjects in a sample. For example, CV is useful for estimating the minimum number of electron micrographs (Nmin) required to obtain a representative field sample for stereological analysis. To facilitate the determination of Nmin, we have written a program (COEFficient) for DOS microcomputers which calculates CVs. COEF assists the user in reducing error to that which solely reflects biological variability, thereby minimizing the time and cost of subsequent analyses.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G Herbener, R Goodfliesh, B Fass-Holmes. 1992. A microcomputer program for evaluating sampling error: an application to stereological methods for electron microscopy.. https://doi.org/10.3109/10520299209110029

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Fundamental study of helical scanning CT--evaluation of spatial resolution in the longitudinal axis].

We evaluated spatial resolution in the longitudinal axis with helical scanning CT using a fourth-generation fast CT scanner. We made a phantom by stringing acrylic balls (65 mm phi x 8 and 9 mm phi x 6). The acquired images were processed by MPR and assessed visually to evaluate axis resolution. With the conventional scanning method, the partial volume effect varied with the starting position, but helical scanning was able to reconstruct high-resolution images using continuous raw data. During helical scanning, axis resolution varied depending on the slice width and sliding speed of the couch top. Even if the sliding speed was kept constant at 4 mm/sec, axis resolution was superior with a slice width of 2 mm than with one of 5 mm.

Microcomputers