Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 16124354

Cryptococcal abscess--unusual presentation.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T V Rao, C S V Subramanyam. 2005. Cryptococcal abscess--unusual presentation.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16124354/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Clinicopathological significance of microscopic abscess formation at the invasive margin of advanced low rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathological significance of microscopic abscess formation (MAF) at the invasive front of advanced low rectal cancer. METHODS: The clinicopathological features of 226 consecutive patients with low rectal cancer, who underwent curative resection between May 1997 and December 2002, were analysed. RESULTS: Fifty-seven (25.2 per cent) of the 226 tumours had MAF and 169 (74.8 per cent) did not. Patients with tumours showing MAF were more likely to have extended surgery than those without MAF: 47 versus 31.4 per cent respectively underwent non-sphincter-preserving surgery (P=0.029) and 82 versus 60.9 per cent underwent lateral lymph node dissection (P=0.003). The incidence of lymph node metastases was lower in patients with MAF (30 versus 53.3 per cent; P=0.002). Univariable analysis of disease-free survival revealed that depth of invasion (P<0.001), lymph node status (P<0.001), histological type (P=0.035), lymphatic invasion (P<0.001), venous invasion (P<0.001), perineural invasion (P<0.001), focal dedifferentiation (P<0.001) and MAF (P<0.001) were significant prognostic factors. Multivariable analysis showed that lymph node status (P<0.001), perineural invasion (P=0.002), venous invasion (P=0.033) and MAF (P=0.012) remained independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: MAF may reflect indolent tumour behaviour and a more favourable outcome in patients with advanced low rectal cancer.

Abscess↗

Comparison of therapeutic effectiveness of percutaneous drainage with antibiotics versus antibiotics alone in the treatment of periappendiceal abscess: is appendectomy always necessary after perforation of appendix?

BACKGROUND: The present study was designed to compare the therapeutic effectiveness of percutaneous drainage with antibiotics versus antibiotics alone in the treatment of appendicitis complicated by periappendiceal abscess. METHODS: In a prospective study, 50 patients with acute appendicitis complicated by periappendiceal abscess > or = 3 cm in size were randomly assigned to two groups. The first group received treatment with ultrasound guided-percutaneous drainage and i.v. antibiotics (ampicillin, cefuroxime, and metronidazole), and the other group received antibiotics only. Patient's baseline characteristics, duration of hospital stay, and treatment outcome and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: Appendectomy was avoided in 16/25 patients in the drainage group and 2/25 patients in the non-drainage group during follow-up with RR of 0.39 (95% CI = 0.22-0.62; p < 0.05). One patient in the drainage group and 8 patients in the non-drainage group underwent surgery in the first month after the beginning of treatment. Eight patients in the drainage group and 15 in the non-drainage group underwent interval appendectomy. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding patient demographics, abscess size, and pretreatment clinical symptoms. Hospital stay up to the subsidence of clinical and sonographic signs was significantly shorter (p < 0.001) in the drainage group, with a mean difference of 6.4 days (95% CI = 5.0-7.9; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous drainage with antibiotics is a safe and effective way of treating acute perforated appendicitis. The recurrence rate for these patients is relatively low, and very often interval appendectomy is not required. For patients with periappendiceal abscess > or = 3 cm in diameter, antibiotic therapy alone is insufficient and the recurrence rate is high.

Abscess↗

A case of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck producing granulocyte-colony stimulating factor with marked leukocytosis.

In squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), tumor cells have been shown to secrete detectable amounts of various cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, and transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta. These tumor-derived factors might be responsible for promoting malignancy. Here, we describe a SCCHN patient with tumor produced G-CSF and characterized by marked leukocytosis. In this 45-year-old man, severe leukocytosis developed in parallel with aggressive tumor growth. G-CSF production by the tumor was confirmed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Serum G-CSF levels were elevated. The leukocyte counts and the blood G-CSF level decreased following a course of radiotherapy. Tumor cells were also positive for G-CSF receptor, suggesting autocrine growth regulation by G-CSF. Moreover, the tumor cells were also investigated by IHC with anti-p53, anti-P-glycoprotein (P-gp), anti-thymidylate synthase (TS), and anti-dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), which molecules are thought to contribute the acquisition of therapeutic resistance. The tumor cells were positively stained for TS and DPD, but neither p53 nor P-gp. These results suggest that a variety of molecules may be responsible for acquisition of high malignancy.

Abscess↗