PubMed · 15993244
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Clement C Y Tham, Dexter Y L Leung, Doris W F Yick, Dennis S C Lam. 2005. Changes in the RNFL.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.12.008
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Blood pressure (BP) varies according to cycles characterized by a reduction during sleep and an increase on awakening. The nighttime decrease is absent or blunted in some patients (termed "non-dippers"). Cross-sectional and prospective data have shown that non-dippers have more target organ damage than have dippers in normotensive and hypertensive subjects. We reviewed the English language literature regarding this association. A non-fortuitous association seems to exist between non-dipper status and cardiovascular risk such as stroke and cardiac events. Among diabetic patients, this phenomenon has been described to occur more often in individuals with autonomic neuropathy and with different degrees of diabetic nephropathy. In normoalbuminuric normotensive type I diabetic patients without any degree of autonomic dysfunction, according to traditional cardiovascular tests, diastolic BP (dBP) night/day ratio is associated with an increased glomerular filtration rate and an increased extracellular volume. The disruption of the circadian rhythm of sympathovagal activity in non-dipper patients was associated with higher levels in systolic BP (sBP) and dBP and with a reduced decline in sBP and dBP levels during the night. Therefore, the prognostic implications of the non-dipper status may be important since the overall 24-h blood pressure load is elevated in these individuals. These data suggest that patients in whom blood pressure decreases during the night incur less damage to their brain, kidneys, heart, and blood vessels than people with elevated nocturnal BP.
The proinflammatory mediator CD40 ligand plays an important role in atherogenesis. Biological mechanisms underlying statin and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker therapies differ. Therefore, we compared the effects of these therapies either alone or in combination on plasma soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L). This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over trial with three treatment arms (each 2 months) and two washout periods (each 2 months). Forty-seven hypertensive, hypercholesterolemic patients were given simvastatin 20mg and placebo, simvastatin 20mg and losartan 100mg, or losartan 100mg and placebo daily during each 2 month treatment period. Simvastatin alone did not significantly reduce sCD40L levels relative to baseline measurements when the entire cohort was analyzed. However, simvastatin significantly reduced sCD40L levels from 5.10+/-0.34 to 3.07+/-0.43ng/ml (P=0.002) in a subgroup of 18 patients with high baseline sCD40L levels >2.95ng/ml. Combined therapy or losartan alone significantly decreased plasma sCD40L levels relative to baseline measurements by 14+/-7% (P=0.001) and 13+/-10% (P=0.001), respectively. These decreases were significantly greater than those observed with simvastatin alone (P=0.023 by ANOVA). Significant inverse correlations between baseline sCD40L levels and percent changes in sCD40L levels were observed (r=-0.456, P=0.001 after simvastatin alone; r=-0.476, P<0.001 after combined therapy; r=-0.451, P=0.002 after losartan alone). Losartan alone or combined therapy significantly reduced plasma sCD40L levels more than simvastatin alone in our subjects. Simvastatin, losartan and combined therapy significantly reduced sCD40L to the greatest extent in patients with high baseline sCD40L levels.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.