PubMed · 15975356
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Yves Louagie. 2005. Invited commentary.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.03.083
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: Observational studies suggest that skeletonization of the internal thoracic artery (ITA) can improve conduit flow and length and reduce deep sternal infections and postoperative pain. We performed a randomized, double-blind, within-patient comparison of skeletonized and nonskeletonized ITAs in patients undergoing coronary surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients (n = 48) undergoing bilateral ITA harvest were randomized to receive 1 skeletonized and 1 nonskeletonized ITA. Intraoperatively, ITA flow was assessed directly and with a Doppler flow probe before and after topical application of papaverine. ITA harvest time and conduit length were recorded. A blinded assessment of pain (visual analog scale) and dysesthesia (physical examination) was performed at discharge, at 2 weeks, and at a 3-month follow-up. Sternal perfusion was assessed with nuclear imaging (n = 7). Skeletonization required longer ITA harvest times (27 +/- 1 versus 24 +/- 1 minutes; P = 0.04). There was a trend toward increased ITA length in the skeletonized group (18.2 +/- 0.3 versus 17.7 +/- 0.3 cm; P = 0.09). In situ ITA flow was lower in skeletonized arteries (7.4 +/- 0.9 versus 10.1 +/- 1.0 mL/min; P = 0.01) and increased significantly after ITA division and papaverine application. Postanastomotic flows were similar between groups. Skeletonization was associated with decreased pain at the 3-month follow-up and a reduction in major sensory deficits at the 4-week and 3-month (17% versus 50%; P = 0.002) follow-ups. Baseline adjusted sternal perfusion was significantly greater by 17 +/- 6% (P = 0.03) on the skeletonized side. CONCLUSIONS: Skeletonization results in reduced postoperative pain and dysesthesia and increased sternal perfusion at follow-up but does not produce increased conduit flow. ITA skeletonization may be a strategy for reducing morbidity after CABG.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the standard surgical procedure for the treatment of advanced coronary artery disease. CABG surgery has been demonstrated to improve symptoms and, in specific subgroups of patients, to prolong life. Despite its success, the long-term outcome of coronary bypass surgery is strongly influenced by the fate of the vascular conduits used. Impressive long-term disease-free patency rate of the left internal thoracic artery-left anterior descending coronary artery (LITA-LAD) graft, coupled with proven long-term survival benefits, has led to its becoming a 'golden standard' of CABG. Previous long-term studies have also shown unsatisfactory patency of saphenous vein grafts used for myocardial revascularization, compared with internal thoracic artery grafts. Thus, the use of arterial conduits has expanded beyond the internal thoracic arteries (ITAs) to include the right gastroepiploic artery, the inferior epigastric artery, and the radial artery. The assumption is that although the performance of one or two arterial ITA graft is superb, more arterial grafts should perform better in the long-term follow-up. Several studies concerning the use of the radial artery bypass grafts have documented excellent clinical results and satisfactory short-term as well as mid-term patency rates at restudy angiography, supporting its continued use as a bypass conduit. However, a note of caution concerning radial artery conduit patency rate have appeared in few recent reports. Thus, in this paper, we summarize the current evidence about the radial artery as a conduit in CABG surgery, with special emphasis on the clinical results.